MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

aetherAI vs Sectra Pathology

aetherAI's homepage describes the company's own analysis applications for slide quality control, cell counting and IHC quantification. A 2025 Translational Oncology paper with an aetherAI-affiliated author compared its Ki-67 morphometry against 3DHistech, Roche and manual counts. That suits a lab that wants analysis tools from the maker of its viewer.

Sectra sells image management and hosts AI made by others. The Digital Pathology Module holds K193054 from March 2020 and K232208 from April 2024, the latter for primary diagnosis with the Leica Aperio GT 450 DX and a specified Dell display in SVS and DICOM formats. Sectra says it was the first FDA clearance to allow DICOM pathology images for diagnosis. Through the Amplifier marketplace a lab buys third-party AI apps on a single contract, and the vendor claims 50-plus AI vendors integrated. A hospital that wants pathology and radiology images in one viewer fits Sectra, and a lab that wants to choose among many AI vendors finds aetherAI the weaker fit.

Pathology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

aetherAI logo

aetherAI

by aetherAI · founded 2015

FDA-cleared slide viewer for hospital pathology labs. Bone marrow and colon polyp AI modules are TFDA approved in Taiwan.

Digital pathology image management (Sectra IDS7) with a marketplace for third-party AI apps. Sectra does not make the AI.

When to pick each one

aetherAI

  • Own analysis apps from the viewer's maker
  • Ki-67 paper by an affiliated author vs 3DHistech, Roche
Read the full aetherAI review

Sectra Pathology

  • Amplifier marketplace for third-party AI on one contract
  • K232208 with DICOM support and Leica GT 450 DX
Read the full Sectra Pathology review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

aetherAI

51of 100

Solid choice

Sectra Pathology

33of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for aetherAI and Sectra Pathology
DimensionaetherAISectra PathologyDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 210 / 21+14.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

aetherAI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Sectra Pathology

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Contact form only.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecaetherAISectra Pathology
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2015n/a
HQTWSE

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full pathology comparison

Digital pathology workflows with FDA-cleared cancer detection (prostate, breast, colon), IHC scoring (HER2, Ki67), and AI-powered image management. Tempus, PathAI, Proscia dominate.