aetherAI vs Vesta
aetherAI's homepage lists a slide management and viewing system, system planning and implementation, and a scanning solution built with Techman Robot and Hamamatsu Photonics. Valar's Vesta page describes a test that a urologist orders and that Valar says its CLIA-certified laboratory performs. A pathology department and a urology practice are unrelated accounts for these two vendors.
Pathology departments building a scanner-to-viewer rollout are aetherAI's market. The FDA cleared aetherSlide as K233126 for primary diagnosis of scanned FFPE slides, and the company lists ISO 13485 and ISO 27001 certificates.
Urologists treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer order Vesta for a BCG response estimate from routine H&E slides, and Valar says the report comes about three days after the sample reaches its lab. Valar says patients with its biomarker face twice the risk of non-response. The BCG papers in J Urol and Eur Urol Oncol, both from 2025, carry Valar affiliations. Valar raised a $22M Series A in May 2024.
Pathology · Reviewed November 2, 2026
When to pick each one
aetherAI
- Hospital digital pathology planning and implementation
- ISO 13485 and ISO 27001 certificates listed
Vesta
- BCG response estimate from routine H&E slides
- Vendor says results about 3 days after sample arrives
- Ordered by urologists through a portal
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
aetherAI
51of 100
Vesta
16of 100
| Dimension | aetherAI | Vesta | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 18 / 18 | 0 / 18 | +18 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 4.2 | 0 / 4.2 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 2.4 | 0 / 2.4 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 14.7 / 21 | 8.4 / 21 | +6.3 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 7.8 | 0 / 7.8 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 6 / 6 | 0 / 6 | +6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
aetherAI
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Vesta
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
aetherAI
FDA decisions
K233126 (opens in new tab)510(k)2024-05-30
aetherSlide
Peer-reviewed
2 PubMed records name aetherAI.
Vesta
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Vesta.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | aetherAI | Vesta |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | 2015 | n/a |
| HQ | TW | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full pathology comparison
Digital pathology workflows with FDA-cleared cancer detection (prostate, breast, colon), IHC scoring (HER2, Ki67), and AI-powered image management. Tempus, PathAI, Proscia dominate.


