MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

aetherAI vs Vesta

aetherAI's homepage lists a slide management and viewing system, system planning and implementation, and a scanning solution built with Techman Robot and Hamamatsu Photonics. Valar's Vesta page describes a test that a urologist orders and that Valar says its CLIA-certified laboratory performs. A pathology department and a urology practice are unrelated accounts for these two vendors.

Pathology departments building a scanner-to-viewer rollout are aetherAI's market. The FDA cleared aetherSlide as K233126 for primary diagnosis of scanned FFPE slides, and the company lists ISO 13485 and ISO 27001 certificates.

Urologists treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer order Vesta for a BCG response estimate from routine H&E slides, and Valar says the report comes about three days after the sample reaches its lab. Valar says patients with its biomarker face twice the risk of non-response. The BCG papers in J Urol and Eur Urol Oncol, both from 2025, carry Valar affiliations. Valar raised a $22M Series A in May 2024.

Pathology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

aetherAI logo

aetherAI

by aetherAI · founded 2015

FDA-cleared slide viewer for hospital pathology labs. Bone marrow and colon polyp AI modules are TFDA approved in Taiwan.

Vesta logo

Vesta

by Valar Labs

Lab test run in a CLIA lab: AI on routine bladder cancer slides predicts BCG response, ordered by urologists.

When to pick each one

aetherAI

  • Hospital digital pathology planning and implementation
  • ISO 13485 and ISO 27001 certificates listed
Read the full aetherAI review

Vesta

  • BCG response estimate from routine H&E slides
  • Vendor says results about 3 days after sample arrives
  • Ordered by urologists through a portal
Read the full Vesta review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

aetherAI

51of 100

Solid choice

Vesta

16of 100

Tracked
Score by dimension for aetherAI and Vesta
DimensionaetherAIVestaDifference
FDA clearance18 / 180 / 18+18
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 218.4 / 21+6.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

aetherAI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Vesta

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecaetherAIVesta
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2015n/a
HQTWn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full pathology comparison

Digital pathology workflows with FDA-cleared cancer detection (prostate, breast, colon), IHC scoring (HER2, Ki67), and AI-powered image management. Tempus, PathAI, Proscia dominate.