MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Aiforia vs Artera

The regulatory routes differ. ArteraAI Prostate software holds an FDA De Novo (DEN240068, decided July 31, 2025), and the commercial test runs in Artera's CLIA lab as a lab-developed test on the same platform. Aiforia's prostate biopsy suite is CE-IVD marked, and the vendor labels it RUO/PSO outside the EU and EEA.

A urology clinic that wants a prognosis for a man 55 or older with prostate cancer picks Artera, which works from existing H&E slides. A pathology lab in the EU that wants image analysis software in house fits Aiforia, and a lab can build its own models in Aiforia Create. A clinic ordering a test and a lab buying software are separate purchases. Aiforia's pricing page returns a 404, and Artera's homepage states no price.

Aiforia's security page lists ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and ISO 13485, and Artera's homepage lists SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA.

Pathology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Aiforia logo

Aiforia

by Aiforia Technologies

Pathology image analysis AI: CE-IVD prostate cancer biopsy suite and clinical suite viewer, plus research tools. No FDA clearance.

Artera logo

Artera

by Artera

AI risk scores from H&E slides for prostate and breast cancer, run by a CLIA lab. ArteraAI Prostate software is FDA De Novo authorized.

When to pick each one

Aiforia

  • CE-IVD marked prostate biopsy suite
  • Aiforia Create builds a lab's own models
  • ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and ISO 13485
Read the full Aiforia review

Artera

  • ArteraAI Prostate holds FDA De Novo DEN240068
  • Risk scores from existing H&E slides
  • Prostate and breast tests run in a CLIA lab
Read the full Artera review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Aiforia

31of 100

Competitive

Artera

65of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Aiforia and Artera
DimensionAiforiaArteraDifference
FDA clearance0 / 1818 / 18-18
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 2114.7 / 210
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review3.9 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-3.9
Funding & adoption signal6 / 123 / 12+3
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Aiforia

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. The pricing page returns a 404.

Artera

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecAiforiaArtera
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQFIUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full pathology comparison

Digital pathology workflows with FDA-cleared cancer detection (prostate, breast, colon), IHC scoring (HER2, Ki67), and AI-powered image management. Tempus, PathAI, Proscia dominate.