MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Harrison.ai vs Bunkerhill Health

Bunkerhill sells an AI agent platform to health systems, with nine FDA-cleared imaging algorithms alongside it, among them BMD (K242295) and ECG-EF (K250649). Its homepage lists referral queue prioritization, oral-oncolytic prior authorization, osteoporosis detection from prior CTs using FDA-cleared opportunistic BMD measurement, and heart failure follow-up for patients with LVEF 40% or below. Its Trust Center lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA and ISO 27001:2022, with the SOC 2 report available on request.

Annalise, now marketed as Harrison.ai, serves emergency radiology groups reading chest X-ray and head CT, with pneumothorax and trauma triage clearances and a vendor figure of up to 130 findings on head CT. NHS Grampian recorded 91% specificity, 78% sensitivity and a 3% PPV for it. Its SOC 2 status appears only on the HealthAIdb directory.

An emergency department or small practice reading its own films is the wrong customer for a health-system agent platform. A US health system whose security review demands a SOC 2 Type II report up front puts Annalise behind.

Radiology · Reviewed November 1, 2026

Harrison.ai logo

Harrison.ai

by Harrison.ai

Imaging AI for chest X-ray, head CT and chest CT, with up to 130 findings on head CT (vendor figure).

Bunkerhill Health logo

Bunkerhill Health

by Bunkerhill Health

AI agent platform for health systems covering referrals, prior auth, care coordination and imaging, built on nine FDA-cleared imaging algorithms.

When to pick each one

Harrison.ai

  • Chest X-ray triage cleared for pneumothorax and trauma
  • Results returned to PACS or a RIS worklist
  • Vendor reports use in 45+ NHS Trusts
Read the full Harrison.ai review

Bunkerhill Health

  • Nine 510(k)s, including bone density and coronary calcium
  • SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA and ISO 27001:2022 listed
  • Osteoporosis detection from prior CTs
Read the full Bunkerhill Health review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Harrison.ai

35of 100

Competitive

Bunkerhill Health

40of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Harrison.ai and Bunkerhill Health
DimensionHarrison.aiBunkerhill HealthDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 123 / 12+5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Harrison.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Book a demo.

Bunkerhill Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Quote onlyn/an/aNo public price. The site offers a demo request only.

Evidence

Harrison.ai

FDA decisions

Show 4 more

Bunkerhill Health

FDA decisions

Show 4 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecHarrison.aiBunkerhill Health
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQAUn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.