MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Harrison.ai vs Ultromics EchoGo

A hospital group's chest-imaging service is the Harrison.ai buyer, and the vendor says 3,500 clinicians at over 1,000 sites use it. A Radiology study of 5,235 patients compared seven chest X-ray AI devices, Annalise Enterprise CXR v3.8 among them, for lung cancer detection and found all produced more false positives than radiologist reports. Ultromics EchoGo goes to a hospital echo lab with a heart failure pathway. Heart Failure covers HFpEF on an apical four-chamber clip with EF of 50% or higher, and a 2026 JACC Heart Failure paper using the MESA cohort of 2,544 people reported an AUROC of 0.77 for EchoGo HF against 0.70 for H2FPEF in early HFpEF. Amyloidosis is cleared as a screening aid for adults 65 and over with heart failure, and CPT Category III 0932T applies to Heart Failure. Harrison.ai's pages describe radiology reading and Ultromics's describe transthoracic echocardiography, and no buyer holds both budgets.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Harrison.ai logo

Harrison.ai

by Harrison.ai

Imaging AI for chest X-ray, head CT and chest CT, with up to 130 findings on head CT (vendor figure).

Ultromics EchoGo logo

Ultromics EchoGo

by Ultromics

FDA-cleared AI on echocardiograms that flags heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and screens for cardiac amyloidosis.

When to pick each one

Harrison.ai

  • Chest X-ray, head CT and chest CT reading for hospital radiology
  • Vendor says 3,500 clinicians at over 1,000 sites
Read the full Harrison.ai review

Ultromics EchoGo

  • HFpEF and cardiac amyloidosis on echocardiography
  • CPT Category III 0932T applies to Heart Failure
  • MESA cohort AUROC 0.77 versus 0.70 for H2FPEF
Read the full Ultromics EchoGo review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Harrison.ai

35of 100

Competitive

Ultromics EchoGo

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Harrison.ai and Ultromics EchoGo
DimensionHarrison.aiUltromics EchoGoDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 106 / 10-6
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Harrison.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Book a demo.

Ultromics EchoGo

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Harrison.ai

FDA decisions

Show 4 more

Ultromics EchoGo

FDA decisions

Show 1 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecHarrison.aiUltromics EchoGo
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQAUGB

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.