MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Artera vs Freenome

Freenome's SimpleScreen CRC starts with a blood draw from an adult aged 45 or older at average risk, and a positive result goes to colonoscopy. ArteraAI starts from the biopsy slide of a patient already diagnosed with prostate or breast cancer. Primary care screening programs and radiation oncology practices order from separate vendors.

FDA approved P250029 in July 2026 on the PREEMPT CRC trial of more than 48,000 asymptomatic adults. The vendor reports 81.1% sensitivity for colorectal cancer, 13.7% for advanced precancerous lesions and 90.4% specificity for advanced neoplasia. Abbott is to commercialize the test exclusively in the US and handle reimbursement, and the approval release gives no price or CLIA lab.

A radiation oncology practice weighing androgen deprivation for prostate cancer would order Artera. Artera says the analysis uses existing H&E slides with no additional staining and returns results within one to two days of the specimen reaching its CLIA lab.

Pathology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Artera logo

Artera

by Artera

AI risk scores from H&E slides for prostate and breast cancer, run by a CLIA lab. ArteraAI Prostate software is FDA De Novo authorized.

Freenome logo

Freenome

by Freenome · founded 2014

FDA-approved SimpleScreen CRC blood test for colorectal cancer screening in adults 45 and older at average risk.

When to pick each one

Artera

  • Artera says it works from existing H&E slides
  • Artera says results come 1 to 2 days after receipt
Read the full Artera review

Freenome

  • Blood test for adults 45 and older at average risk
  • PMA P250029 approved, July 2026
  • Abbott to commercialize in the US
Read the full Freenome review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Artera

65of 100

Top-ranked

Freenome

40of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Artera and Freenome
DimensionArteraFreenomeDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 210 / 21+14.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Artera

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Freenome

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecArteraFreenome
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2014
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full pathology comparison

Digital pathology workflows with FDA-cleared cancer detection (prostate, breast, colon), IHC scoring (HER2, Ki67), and AI-powered image management. Tempus, PathAI, Proscia dominate.