MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Artera vs Proscia Concentriq

Proscia's Concentriq is the platform a pathology department runs on its scanned slides: image management, case review and AI apps. AP-Dx is cleared for primary diagnosis of FFPE surgical pathology slides, first as K230839 in February 2024 and then as K261380 in August 2026, which the vendor's release says adds the Leica Aperio GT 450 DX, cloud deployment and a change control plan. The vendor reports 4,000+ hospitals and clinics and a Best in KLAS 2026 ranking.

Artera sells to a different person. A urologist or breast oncologist sends one patient's specimen and gets a prognostic report back, built from the existing H&E slides with no extra staining, and the vendor says results arrive within 1 to 2 days of receipt. Proscia's pages name clinical labs and biopharma as its customers. The pathology department buys Concentriq, and the treating clinician with a prostate or breast cancer diagnosis uses Artera.

Pathology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Artera logo

Artera

by Artera

AI risk scores from H&E slides for prostate and breast cancer, run by a CLIA lab. ArteraAI Prostate software is FDA De Novo authorized.

Concentriq pathology platform for clinical labs and biopharma: image management, case review and AI apps, with FDA-cleared AP-Dx for primary diagnosis.

When to pick each one

Artera

  • Prognostic tests for prostate and breast cancer
  • Results in 1 to 2 days, vendor says
  • Runs on existing H&E slides, no extra staining
Read the full Artera review

Proscia Concentriq

  • AP-Dx cleared for FFPE primary diagnosis, K261380
  • Vendor reports 4,000+ hospitals and clinics
  • Sold to clinical labs and biopharma
Read the full Proscia Concentriq review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Artera

65of 100

Top-ranked

Proscia Concentriq

40of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Artera and Proscia Concentriq
DimensionArteraProscia ConcentriqDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 106 / 10+4
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 210 / 21+14.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Artera

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Proscia Concentriq

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecArteraProscia Concentriq
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full pathology comparison

Digital pathology workflows with FDA-cleared cancer detection (prostate, breast, colon), IHC scoring (HER2, Ki67), and AI-powered image management. Tempus, PathAI, Proscia dominate.