MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Artera vs Vesta

Valar sells the bladder tests. Vesta Bladder runs in Valar's CLIA lab, and BCGPredict flags non-muscle-invasive patients at higher risk of not responding to BCG, twice the risk of non-response by the vendor's account, with a turnaround of about 3 days after the sample reaches the lab. A urologist managing BCG decisions is the Valar buyer.

Artera's tests cover prostate and breast. Its homepage claims Medicare reimbursement and coverage by many commercial plans, and its androgen deprivation model has an NEJM Evidence paper, so a prostate cancer team deciding on hormone therapy is the Artera buyer. Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is where the product lists meet, since Artera shows an mHSPC version of its test and Valar shows Vesta Prostate, with a 2026 JCO Precision Oncology paper. Valar's Vesta page describes a Financial Access Program, states no coverage and does not say whether Vesta Prostate can be ordered, so for that mHSPC team Artera, with its stated coverage and its NEJM Evidence paper, is the stronger pick on what the pages say.

Pathology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Artera logo

Artera

by Artera

AI risk scores from H&E slides for prostate and breast cancer, run by a CLIA lab. ArteraAI Prostate software is FDA De Novo authorized.

Vesta logo

Vesta

by Valar Labs

Lab test run in a CLIA lab: AI on routine bladder cancer slides predicts BCG response, ordered by urologists.

When to pick each one

Artera

  • mHSPC version of the prostate test
  • Vendor claims Medicare and commercial coverage
  • NEJM Evidence paper on androgen deprivation benefit
Read the full Artera review

Vesta

  • BCGPredict for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
  • Turnaround about 3 days after sample arrives
  • Risk Stratify scores recurrence and progression
Read the full Vesta review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Artera

65of 100

Top-ranked

Vesta

16of 100

Tracked
Score by dimension for Artera and Vesta
DimensionArteraVestaDifference
FDA clearance18 / 180 / 18+18
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 218.4 / 21+6.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Artera

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Vesta

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecArteraVesta
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full pathology comparison

Digital pathology workflows with FDA-cleared cancer detection (prostate, breast, colon), IHC scoring (HER2, Ki67), and AI-powered image management. Tempus, PathAI, Proscia dominate.