MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Bunkerhill Health vs Iterative Health

SKOUT from Iterative Health is computer-aided polyp detection on the live colonoscopy video feed, with six openFDA decisions under product code QNP between August 2022 and December 2025. A sponsor-run randomized trial in Gastroenterology, 22 endoscopists at five centers, compared 677 standard colonoscopies with 682 using the device: adenomas per colonoscopy were 0.83 standard versus 1.05 with SKOUT (P=.002), and adenoma detection rate was 43.9% versus 47.8% (P=.065, not significant). The company's home page now leads with clinical research and a $77 million Series C. A GI practice or endoscopy center is the buyer.

Bunkerhill's homepage describes agents for oral-oncolytic prior authorization through appeal and heart failure follow-up, with its clearances in CT calcium, bone density, aortic and ECG algorithms. A health system buying agent work across referrals and follow-up is the buyer there.

Polyp detection during colonoscopy and agent work on authorizations and follow-up are different purchases. A GI practice inside a health system could sit on both lists.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Bunkerhill Health logo

Bunkerhill Health

by Bunkerhill Health

AI agent platform for health systems covering referrals, prior auth, care coordination and imaging, built on nine FDA-cleared imaging algorithms.

Iterative Health logo

Iterative Health

by Iterative Health · founded 2017

Real-time AI polyp detection for colonoscopy with the FDA-cleared SKOUT system, for endoscopists and endoscopy centers.

When to pick each one

Bunkerhill Health

  • Oral-oncolytic prior authorization agent use case
  • Heart failure follow-up agent, LVEF 40% or below
Read the full Bunkerhill Health review

Iterative Health

  • SKOUT colon polyp detection, six openFDA decisions
  • Randomized trial, adenomas per colonoscopy 0.83 vs 1.05
  • GI Alliance and One GI named as partners
Read the full Iterative Health review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Bunkerhill Health

40of 100

Competitive

Iterative Health

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Bunkerhill Health and Iterative Health
DimensionBunkerhill HealthIterative HealthDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Bunkerhill Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Quote onlyn/an/aNo public price. The site offers a demo request only.

Iterative Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Evidence

Bunkerhill Health

FDA decisions

Show 4 more

Iterative Health

FDA decisions

Show 1 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecBunkerhill HealthIterative Health
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2017
HQn/aUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.