Bunkerhill Health vs ScreenPoint Transpara
ScreenPoint's Transpara was the AI in MASAI, the Lund University randomized trial in Swedish mammography screening, according to the vendor. ScreenPoint reports sensitivity of 80.5% against 73.8% for standard double reading at 98.5% specificity, across more than 105,000 women. The trial is Swedish and single-vendor, so how it carries over to US settings without double reading is an open question, and the 29% and 44% headline figures on the vendor page come from different analyses. Transpara has eight 510(k)s, the latest in August 2026, works on 2D and 3D mammograms and calls itself vendor agnostic. A screening program or breast imaging center reading mammograms is who it serves. Bunkerhill sells to health systems instead, as an AI agent platform with nine cleared imaging algorithms, and its customer evidence is one quote from the Chief AI Officer at UTMB Health.
Radiology · Reviewed November 1, 2026

Bunkerhill Health
by Bunkerhill Health
AI agent platform for health systems covering referrals, prior auth, care coordination and imaging, built on nine FDA-cleared imaging algorithms.

ScreenPoint Transpara
by ScreenPoint Medical
Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.
When to pick each one
Bunkerhill Health
- Agent platform for health systems, nine cleared algorithms
- Osteoporosis detection from prior CTs via cleared BMD
- SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA listed
ScreenPoint Transpara
- Eight Transpara 510(k)s, latest August 2026
- 2D and 3D mammography, vendor agnostic per vendor
- Vendor says Transpara was the AI in MASAI
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Bunkerhill Health
40of 100
ScreenPoint Transpara
56of 100
| Dimension | Bunkerhill Health | ScreenPoint Transpara | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 18 / 18 | 18 / 18 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 10 / 10 | 0 / 10 | +10 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 4.2 | 0 / 4.2 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 2.4 | 0 / 2.4 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 18.2 | 12.7 / 18.2 | -12.7 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 7.8 | 7.8 / 7.8 | -7.8 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 6 / 12 | -3 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Bunkerhill Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quote only | n/a | n/a | No public price. The site offers a demo request only. |
ScreenPoint Transpara
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Virtual demo and contact only. |
Evidence
Bunkerhill Health
FDA decisions
K260167 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-03-06
Bunkerhill Contrast AVC
K260166 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-03-06
Bunkerhill Contrast CAC
K250662 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-10-03
Bunkerhill MAC
K250649 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-09-19
Bunkerhill ECG-EF
K243779 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-07-01
Bunkerhill Abdominal Aortic Quantification (AAQ)
Show 4 more
K242295 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-04-08
BunkerHill BMD
K243229 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-01-27
Bunkerhill AVC
K240369 (opens in new tab)510(k)2024-09-27
CAC (gated) Algorithm
K230223 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-04-25
iCAC Device
ScreenPoint Transpara
FDA decisions
K260898 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-08-14
Transpara (2.1.0)
K241831 (opens in new tab)510(k)2024-11-25
Transpara (2.1.0)
K232096 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-12-11
Transpara Density 1.0.0
K221347 (opens in new tab)510(k)2022-08-03
Transpara 1.7.2
K210404 (opens in new tab)510(k)2021-06-02
Transpara 1.7.0
Show 3 more
K193229 (opens in new tab)510(k)2020-03-05
Transpara
K192287 (opens in new tab)510(k)2019-12-10
Transpara
K181704 (opens in new tab)510(k)2018-11-21
Transpara
Peer-reviewed
3 PubMed records name ScreenPoint Transpara.
- Interval cancer, sensitivity, and specificity comparing AI-supported mammography screening with standard double reading without AI in the MASAI study: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, population-based, screening-accuracy trial. (opens in new tab)
- Screening performance and characteristics of breast cancer detected in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. (opens in new tab)
- Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. (opens in new tab)
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Bunkerhill Health | ScreenPoint Transpara |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | n/a | NL |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full radiology comparison
Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.
