MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Bunkerhill Health vs ScreenPoint Transpara

ScreenPoint's Transpara was the AI in MASAI, the Lund University randomized trial in Swedish mammography screening, according to the vendor. ScreenPoint reports sensitivity of 80.5% against 73.8% for standard double reading at 98.5% specificity, across more than 105,000 women. The trial is Swedish and single-vendor, so how it carries over to US settings without double reading is an open question, and the 29% and 44% headline figures on the vendor page come from different analyses. Transpara has eight 510(k)s, the latest in August 2026, works on 2D and 3D mammograms and calls itself vendor agnostic. A screening program or breast imaging center reading mammograms is who it serves. Bunkerhill sells to health systems instead, as an AI agent platform with nine cleared imaging algorithms, and its customer evidence is one quote from the Chief AI Officer at UTMB Health.

Radiology · Reviewed November 1, 2026

Bunkerhill Health logo

Bunkerhill Health

by Bunkerhill Health

AI agent platform for health systems covering referrals, prior auth, care coordination and imaging, built on nine FDA-cleared imaging algorithms.

ScreenPoint Transpara logo

ScreenPoint Transpara

by ScreenPoint Medical

Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.

When to pick each one

Bunkerhill Health

  • Agent platform for health systems, nine cleared algorithms
  • Osteoporosis detection from prior CTs via cleared BMD
  • SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA listed
Read the full Bunkerhill Health review

ScreenPoint Transpara

  • Eight Transpara 510(k)s, latest August 2026
  • 2D and 3D mammography, vendor agnostic per vendor
  • Vendor says Transpara was the AI in MASAI
Read the full ScreenPoint Transpara review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Bunkerhill Health

40of 100

Competitive

ScreenPoint Transpara

56of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Bunkerhill Health and ScreenPoint Transpara
DimensionBunkerhill HealthScreenPoint TransparaDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.212.7 / 18.2-12.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-7.8
Funding & adoption signal3 / 126 / 12-3
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Bunkerhill Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Quote onlyn/an/aNo public price. The site offers a demo request only.

ScreenPoint Transpara

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Virtual demo and contact only.

Evidence

Bunkerhill Health

FDA decisions

Show 4 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecBunkerhill HealthScreenPoint Transpara
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQn/aNL

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.