MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Bunkerhill Health vs Ultromics EchoGo

A health system that wants one contract for referral queues, oral-oncolytic prior authorization and sepsis documentation queries goes to Bunkerhill. Its homepage calls the product a long-horizon AI agent for health systems, and openFDA lists nine 510(k) decisions under the Bunkerhill names, the first dated April 25, 2023 and the latest March 6, 2026. The Trust Center states SOC 2, HIPAA and ISO 27001:2022.

For a CMIO who needs referrals, prior authorization and imaging under one agreement, Ultromics is the lesser fit. EchoGo is cleared as a diagnostic aid for HFpEF and as a screening aid for amyloidosis, both read from echo.

Ultromics belongs to a cardiology group with its own echo lab. EchoGo Heart Failure reads a single apical four-chamber view in adults over 25 with an ejection fraction of 50% or more. Bunkerhill's homepage describes its own heart failure work as follow-up for patients with an LVEF of 40% or below, a different patient group.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Bunkerhill Health logo

Bunkerhill Health

by Bunkerhill Health

AI agent platform for health systems covering referrals, prior auth, care coordination and imaging, built on nine FDA-cleared imaging algorithms.

Ultromics EchoGo logo

Ultromics EchoGo

by Ultromics

FDA-cleared AI on echocardiograms that flags heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and screens for cardiac amyloidosis.

When to pick each one

Bunkerhill Health

  • Nine 510(k) decisions on openFDA
  • Homepage lists referral queues and prior authorization
  • SOC 2, HIPAA and ISO 27001:2022 on Trust Center
Read the full Bunkerhill Health review

Ultromics EchoGo

  • HFpEF diagnostic aid from one four-chamber view
  • Cleared for adults over 25 with EF 50% or more
Read the full Ultromics EchoGo review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Bunkerhill Health

40of 100

Competitive

Ultromics EchoGo

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Bunkerhill Health and Ultromics EchoGo
DimensionBunkerhill HealthUltromics EchoGoDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 106 / 10+4
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Bunkerhill Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Quote onlyn/an/aNo public price. The site offers a demo request only.

Ultromics EchoGo

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Bunkerhill Health

FDA decisions

Show 4 more

Ultromics EchoGo

FDA decisions

Show 1 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecBunkerhill HealthUltromics EchoGo
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQn/aGB

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.