MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

C-SATS vs OTTAVA (J&J MedTech)

C-SATS and OTTAVA share a parent, Johnson & Johnson MedTech, and nothing in their buying. A robot purchase and a video-grading platform go to different people.

C-SATS came in through the April 2018 acquisition of a University of Washington spinout. It takes video from minimally invasive cases into a cloud library where expert surgeons and trained reviewers grade technique, which suits a residency director benchmarking trainees. C-SATS claims HIPAA compliance and a HITRUST CSF certified library, and states no FDA status or EHR integration. A hospital shopping for a robot finds nothing to buy there.

OTTAVA is a table-integrated soft-tissue robot, FDA De Novo authorized in July 2026 for procedures including gastric bypass, cholecystectomy and appendectomy. J&J describes Polyphonic as an open digital ecosystem bringing learning, media and data insights to OTTAVA teams. It fits a hospital with a general surgery service and a robot capital budget. A department that only wants resident skills graded gets nothing from a robot. Rollout starts with select US customers, an inguinal hernia trial is ongoing, and the authorization rested on an IDE study that began in late 2024.

Surgical AI · Reviewed November 1, 2026

C-SATS logo

C-SATS

by J&J MedTech

Surgical video review and analytics platform.

OTTAVA (J&J MedTech) logo

OTTAVA (J&J MedTech)

by J&J MedTech

OTTAVA, Johnson & Johnson MedTech's soft-tissue surgical robot (FDA De Novo, July 2026), with its Polyphonic digital layer.

When to pick each one

C-SATS

  • Cloud library of recorded minimally invasive cases
  • Benchmarks trainee skills over time
  • Enterprise quote, no public price
Read the full C-SATS review

OTTAVA (J&J MedTech)

  • FDA De Novo authorized soft-tissue robot, July 2026
  • Polyphonic learning and data layer for OTTAVA teams
  • Capital sale, no public price
Read the full OTTAVA (J&J MedTech) review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

C-SATS

36of 100

Competitive

OTTAVA (J&J MedTech)

35of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for C-SATS and OTTAVA (J&J MedTech)
DimensionC-SATSOTTAVA (J&J MedTech)Difference
FDA clearance0 / 1818 / 18-18
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 1.40 / 1.40
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 0.80 / 0.80
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 210 / 21+14.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review3.9 / 7.80 / 7.8+3.9
Funding & adoption signal6 / 128.4 / 12-2.4
Pricing transparency5 / 52.5 / 5+2.5
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

C-SATS

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Plann/an/aEnterprise.

OTTAVA (J&J MedTech)

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Capital sale.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecC-SATSOTTAVA (J&J MedTech)
Free tierYesNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQn/an/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full surgical ai comparison

Surgical video intelligence (Theator), OR analytics (OR Black Box), VR training (Osso VR, FundamentalVR), robotic AI (da Vinci 5 Case Insights). Mostly enterprise capital purchases.