MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

C-SATS vs Proximie

Proximie and C-SATS cover different moments, the live theatre and the finished case. Proximie positions itself as the operating system for intelligent operating rooms, with remote collaboration, a case video library, hardware with built-in computer vision, and an Intelligence Suite with predictive analytics. A health system linking many theatres is its customer, and the homepage claims 500+ facilities in 50 countries, with an NHS AI program spanning 104 theatres. Its studies are education and feasibility papers, and none measure patient outcomes. FDA, CE and UKCA status are not stated.

C-SATS works after the case. Its own site calls it a post-operative surgical insights platform, where expert surgeons and trained reviewers grade recorded video. A systematic review of 16 studies found good or excellent crowd-expert correlation in 12.

A residency program that records its cases for grading is C-SATS's customer, and a surgery department weighing the two faces that split. If it only wants trainee video graded, Proximie's remote collaboration and OR connectivity go unused. If it wants a remote expert in the room during a live case, C-SATS offers no way in. Neither vendor publishes a price.

Surgical AI · Reviewed November 1, 2026

C-SATS logo

C-SATS

by J&J MedTech

Surgical video review and analytics platform.

Proximie logo

Proximie

by Proximie

Operating-room platform for remote surgical collaboration, case recording and analytics. "the operating system for intelligent operating rooms".

When to pick each one

C-SATS

  • Post-operative review of recorded cases
  • Crowd-expert correlation good in 12 of 16 studies
  • Dashboard analytics on demand
Read the full C-SATS review

Proximie

  • Live remote collaboration plus case video library
  • Homepage lists SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001
  • EHR integration listed, no vendors named
Read the full Proximie review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

C-SATS

36of 100

Competitive

Proximie

33of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for C-SATS and Proximie
DimensionC-SATSProximieDifference
FDA clearance0 / 180 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 1.40 / 1.40
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 0.80 / 0.80
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 2114.7 / 210
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review3.9 / 7.83.9 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal6 / 126 / 120
Pricing transparency5 / 52.5 / 5+2.5
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

C-SATS

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Plann/an/aEnterprise.

Proximie

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. The pricing page returns a 404.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecC-SATSProximie
Free tierYesNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQn/aUK

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full surgical ai comparison

Surgical video intelligence (Theator), OR analytics (OR Black Box), VR training (Osso VR, FundamentalVR), robotic AI (da Vinci 5 Case Insights). Mostly enterprise capital purchases.