Caris Life Sciences vs GRAIL
Caris holds an FDA PMA approval (P240010, MI Cancer Seek, November 2024), while the Galleri site says Galleri has not been cleared or approved by FDA. GRAIL filed its PMA in full on January 29, 2026, and on September 23, 2026 an FDA panel voted 7 yes, 2 no and 1 abstention that benefits outweigh risks, with effectiveness at 6 yes and 4 no. The NHS-Galleri trial missed its primary endpoint, and BMJ ran that headline in 2026.
Galleri is a CLIA-lab blood test for adults 50 and older, so a primary care group weighing multi-cancer screening is its buyer. The Caris homepage lists Caris Detect as a multi-cancer blood test and gives no FDA status for it, which makes Detect the Caris product that faces Galleri. A primary care group choosing between the two picks Galleri on the stated facts, a pending PMA and published trial data against a homepage listing. A cancer center sending a tumor biopsy for profiling is a different customer and uses MI Cancer Seek.
Pathology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Caris Life Sciences
by Caris Life Sciences · founded 2008
FDA-approved MI Cancer Seek tumor profiling test for oncologists. The GPSai tissue-of-origin AI is a lab service outside that approval.

GRAIL
by GRAIL
Galleri blood test for multi-cancer early detection, sold as a CLIA lab test. Not FDA cleared or approved.
When to pick each one
Caris Life Sciences
- FDA-approved MI Cancer Seek, PMA P240010
- Lists Caris Detect, a multi-cancer blood test
- Tumor profiling from biopsy tissue
GRAIL
- Galleri screens adults 50 and older
- FDA panel voted 7 to 2 with 1 abstention on benefit-risk
- Randomized NHS-Galleri trial published in 2026
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Caris Life Sciences
65of 100
GRAIL
28of 100
| Dimension | Caris Life Sciences | GRAIL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 18 / 18 | 0 / 18 | +18 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 4.2 | 0 / 4.2 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 2.4 | 0 / 2.4 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 21 / 21 | 8.4 / 21 | +12.6 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 7.8 | 7.8 / 7.8 | -7.8 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 8.4 / 12 | 8.4 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 0 / 5 | +2.5 |
| Years in market | 6 / 6 | 0 / 6 | +6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Caris Life Sciences
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
GRAIL
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price verified. |
Evidence
Caris Life Sciences
FDA decisions
P240010 (opens in new tab)PMA2024-11-05
MI Cancer Seek
Peer-reviewed
5 PubMed records name Caris Life Sciences.
- An AI Approach to Differentiating Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma From Metastases of Other Origins. (opens in new tab)
- Proactive identification of candidates for newly approved targeted therapies using a clinical decision support program. (opens in new tab)
- ERBB2/HER2 landscape and prognostic impact: large-scale, real-world analysis across solid cancers. (opens in new tab)
GRAIL
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names GRAIL.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Caris Life Sciences | GRAIL |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | 2008 | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full pathology comparison
Digital pathology workflows with FDA-cleared cancer detection (prostate, breast, colon), IHC scoring (HER2, Ki67), and AI-powered image management. Tempus, PathAI, Proscia dominate.
