MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Caris Life Sciences vs Indica Labs HALO AI

Caris and Indica both hold FDA records that cover something other than their AI. Caris's PMA P240010 (approved November 5, 2024) covers the MI Cancer Seek sequencing assay and its companion diagnostic claims. The GPSai tissue-of-origin model and FOLFIRSTai are listed under professional services, outside the FDA-approved scope. Indica's K232833 (May 7, 2024) and K252762 (November 25, 2025) cover HALO AP Dx, the case-centric platform for primary diagnosis, and not the HALO AI add-on.

The sequencing report goes to the oncologist's desk, and the viewer and classifier go to a pathology department or pharma group, so each tool has its own buyer. Caris takes FFPE tumor samples for 228-gene profiling with companion diagnostic claims such as PIK3CA for Piqray. Caris says median turnaround is 8 days, and the same page also gives 6 to 9. HALO AP Dx is cleared with the Aperio GT 450 DX and the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360MD, and the research classifier is tuned by the lab itself.

Pathology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Caris Life Sciences logo

Caris Life Sciences

by Caris Life Sciences · founded 2008

FDA-approved MI Cancer Seek tumor profiling test for oncologists. The GPSai tissue-of-origin AI is a lab service outside that approval.

Indica Labs HALO AI logo

Indica Labs HALO AI

by Indica Labs

HALO image analysis and AI for pathology research, plus HALO AP Dx (FDA-cleared) and HALO Prostate AI (CE-IVD) for clinical use.

When to pick each one

Caris Life Sciences

  • MI Cancer Seek PMA P240010 approved November 5, 2024
  • 228 genes plus MSI and TMB from FFPE tissue
  • Vendor says median turnaround 8 days
Read the full Caris Life Sciences review

Indica Labs HALO AI

  • HALO AP Dx has two 510(k) clearances
  • Cleared with Aperio GT 450 DX and NanoZoomer S360MD
  • Research add-on trains classifiers by example
Read the full Indica Labs HALO AI review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Caris Life Sciences

65of 100

Top-ranked

Indica Labs HALO AI

33of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Caris Life Sciences and Indica Labs HALO AI
DimensionCaris Life SciencesIndica Labs HALO AIDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers21 / 210 / 21+21
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Caris Life Sciences

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Indica Labs HALO AI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecCaris Life SciencesIndica Labs HALO AI
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2008n/a
HQUSn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full pathology comparison

Digital pathology workflows with FDA-cleared cancer detection (prostate, breast, colon), IHC scoring (HER2, Ki67), and AI-powered image management. Tempus, PathAI, Proscia dominate.