MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging vs RapidAI

A stroke center that wants ICH triage on non-contrast CT can start from Rapid ICH (K193087), alongside Rapid ASPECTS (K200760) and Rapid LVO (K200941). The vendor claims use in 2,500+ hospitals. Circle has no ICH record among its twelve openFDA records, which rules it out for that buyer.

Each has papers. StrokeSENS has three on PubMed: a 2023 comparison of multiphase CTA perfusion with CT perfusion in 121 patients, a 2022 Neuroradiology paper on LVO accuracy on CTA, and a 2026 AJNR multi-reader study of ASPECTS. Rapid's include a 2024 AJNR comparison with Viz.ai, which found CT perfusion volumes not interchangeable, and a 2022 comparison with Brainomix on ASPECTS, LVO and CTP. NeurologyLive reports the AJNR May 2026 DUEL study, retrospective, single-center and promoted by RapidAI, in which Rapid detected 98% of confirmed LVOs against 73% for Viz.ai.

A hospital with a cardiac imaging lab gets cvi42 and StrokeSENS from one vendor, while Rapid's modules add aneurysm, aortic and pulmonary embolism.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging logo

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

by Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. · founded 2007

cvi42 cardiac MR and CT software with FDA-cleared AI coronary plaque analysis and StrokeSENS acute stroke tools.

RapidAI logo

RapidAI

by RapidAI · founded 2017

Imaging platform for stroke, aneurysm, aortic and pulmonary embolism care, with CT perfusion, LVO and ICH modules.

When to pick each one

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

  • Multiphase CTA perfusion, 121-patient study
  • cvi42 cardiac tools alongside StrokeSENS
Read the full Circle Cardiovascular Imaging review

RapidAI

  • Rapid ICH, ASPECTS and LVO each have K numbers
  • Aneurysm, aortic and pulmonary embolism modules
Read the full RapidAI review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

42of 100

Competitive

RapidAI

65of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging and RapidAI
DimensionCircle Cardiovascular ImagingRapidAIDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.212.7 / 18.2-12.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.83.9 / 7.8-3.9
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 55 / 5-2.5
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

RapidAI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Plann/an/aEnterprise.

Evidence

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

FDA decisions

Show 7 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecCircle Cardiovascular ImagingRapidAI
Free tierNo / unverifiedYes
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20072017
HQCAUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.