MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging vs Ultromics EchoGo

A cardiology department that runs cardiac MR and CT analysis next to an echo lab can buy both of these. The cvi42 platform lists modules for cardiac MR, cardiac CT, AI plaque analysis, vascular CT, interventional planning and electrophysiology, and StrokeSENS covers acute stroke CT and CTA. EchoGo works on transthoracic echocardiography.

The regulatory records differ in size. openFDA lists twelve decisions under the applicant names Circle Cardiovascular Imaging and Circle Neurovascular Imaging, including K251027 for the cvi42 Coronary Plaque Software Application on October 27, 2025. For Ultromics, the vendor says EchoGo Heart Failure showed 90.3% sensitivity and 86.1% specificity in clinical evaluation, citing K240013.

For a department building a coronary plaque program on CT, Ultromics sits on the wrong modality, since EchoGo reads echocardiography and not CT or MR. A department whose first goal is an HFpEF flag on routine echo studies starts with EchoGo.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging logo

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

by Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. · founded 2007

cvi42 cardiac MR and CT software with FDA-cleared AI coronary plaque analysis and StrokeSENS acute stroke tools.

Ultromics EchoGo logo

Ultromics EchoGo

by Ultromics

FDA-cleared AI on echocardiograms that flags heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and screens for cardiac amyloidosis.

When to pick each one

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

  • cvi42 for cardiac MR, cardiac CT and plaque analysis
  • Coronary plaque software cleared October 27, 2025
  • Twelve openFDA decisions under two applicant names
Read the full Circle Cardiovascular Imaging review

Ultromics EchoGo

  • EchoGo reads transthoracic echocardiography
  • Vendor cites 90.3% sensitivity from K240013
Read the full Ultromics EchoGo review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

42of 100

Competitive

Ultromics EchoGo

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging and Ultromics EchoGo
DimensionCircle Cardiovascular ImagingUltromics EchoGoDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 106 / 10-6
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Ultromics EchoGo

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

FDA decisions

Show 7 more

Ultromics EchoGo

FDA decisions

Show 1 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecCircle Cardiovascular ImagingUltromics EchoGo
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2007n/a
HQCAGB

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.