MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Cleerly vs ScreenPoint Transpara

ScreenPoint states that Transpara was the tool in MASAI, a randomized screening trial of more than 105,000 women run by Lund University. The vendor reports a 12% lower interval cancer rate and sensitivity of 80.5% against 73.8% at 98.5% specificity. MASAI ran in Sweden's double-reading screening, so carry-over to US sites that read once is open. Transpara has eight FDA 510(k)s, the latest K260898 in August 2026, works on 2D FFDM and 3D DBT mammograms, and has a separate Density clearance from December 2023. The vendor calls it a second pair of eyes and vendor agnostic.

Transpara serves breast imaging centers and screening programs with FFDM or DBT units, and Cleerly serves coronary CTA programs, so the two address separate exams. For a coronary CTA program, Cleerly's draw is CPT 75577, in effect since January 2026, which gives plaque analysis a Category I billing code.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Cleerly logo

Cleerly

by Cleerly

AI-driven CCTA plaque quantification + CAD staging.

ScreenPoint Transpara logo

ScreenPoint Transpara

by ScreenPoint Medical

Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.

When to pick each one

Cleerly

  • Coronary plaque volume and phenotype from CCTA
  • PowerScribe link for reporting
  • Quote-based sales, demo on request
Read the full Cleerly review

ScreenPoint Transpara

  • Detection on 2D and 3D mammograms, latest 510(k) August 2026
  • MASAI randomized screening trial, Transpara per vendor
  • Separate Transpara Density clearance, December 2023
Read the full ScreenPoint Transpara review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Cleerly

52of 100

Solid choice

ScreenPoint Transpara

56of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Cleerly and ScreenPoint Transpara
DimensionCleerlyScreenPoint TransparaDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review3.9 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-3.9
Funding & adoption signal6 / 126 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Cleerly

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. The homepage offers a demo request.

ScreenPoint Transpara

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Virtual demo and contact only.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecCleerlyScreenPoint Transpara
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSNL

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.