MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Exo vs ScreenPoint Transpara

The vendor says Transpara was the reader aid in MASAI, a randomized screening trial published in The Lancet by Lund University researchers. For the 2026 Lancet analysis, the vendor reports sensitivity of 80.5% with AI-supported reading against 73.8% for standard double reading without AI, at 98.5% specificity, over more than 105,000 women. It separately claims 29% more cancers detected and a 44% workload cut, and those figures come from different analyses. It says Transpara is FDA cleared and CE marked for 2D and 3D mammography, used in more than 30 countries, and works with any vendor's equipment.

Transpara is reading support for mammograms in breast screening programs, while Exo Iris is a handheld scanner for hospitalists and EMS crews at the bedside. Exo's pages list Cardiac AI Suite, Lung AI Suite, Fluid Management AI, SweepAI scan guidance that works offline, and population-health tools for thyroid cancer risk and hip dysplasia. A Samsung Medison collaboration was announced in May 2025.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Exo logo

Exo

by Exo Imaging, Inc.

Handheld ultrasound with FDA-cleared AI for cardiac, lung and fluid assessment, for point-of-care clinicians.

ScreenPoint Transpara logo

ScreenPoint Transpara

by ScreenPoint Medical

Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.

When to pick each one

Exo

  • Scan guidance that works offline
  • Lists thyroid cancer risk and hip dysplasia tools
  • Samsung Medison collaboration announced May 2025
Read the full Exo review

ScreenPoint Transpara

  • Reader aid for 2D and 3D mammograms
  • Latest FDA entry K260898, August 14, 2026
  • Vendor-reported MASAI, AI-supported versus double reading, 80.5% versus 73.8%
Read the full ScreenPoint Transpara review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Exo

28of 100

Niche fit

ScreenPoint Transpara

56of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Exo and ScreenPoint Transpara
DimensionExoScreenPoint TransparaDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.212.7 / 18.2-12.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-7.8
Funding & adoption signal3 / 126 / 12-3
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Exo

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price verified.

ScreenPoint Transpara

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Virtual demo and contact only.

Evidence

Exo

FDA decisions

Show 3 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecExoScreenPoint Transpara
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSNL

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.