MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Eyenuk vs TeraRecon

EyeArt works from color fundus photographs taken on Canon CR-2 AF, Canon CR-2 Plus AF or, per a vendor release in June 2023, Topcon NW400 cameras. A diabetes clinic that already owns one of those cameras gets what Eyenuk describes as a retinopathy grade without an ophthalmologist. openFDA lists two EyeArt decisions, K200667 on August 3, 2020 and K223357 on June 16, 2023.

Retinal photographs and CT or MR studies are different images, so the two products answer separate questions. TeraRecon is advanced visualization first. Its home page lists TeraRecon AV, Intuition, TR Neuro, DETECT and an AI Framework for third-party algorithms, and its own cleared algorithms include Aorta.CT (K243158, January 23, 2025) and Cardiac.Chambers.MR (K241312, November 5, 2024). Hospital radiology departments receive DICOM and HL7 results from the framework in their reporting systems.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Eyenuk logo

Eyenuk

by Eyenuk, Inc.

EyeArt is FDA-cleared autonomous AI that grades diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos, with no physician overread needed.

TeraRecon logo

TeraRecon

by ConcertAI · founded 1997

Advanced CT and MR visualization with cardiac, aorta and neuro AI, plus a vendor-agnostic platform to run third-party AI.

When to pick each one

Eyenuk

  • Canon and Topcon fundus cameras
  • Retinopathy grade without an ophthalmologist
Read the full Eyenuk review

TeraRecon

  • Cardiac MR viewer and post-processing for CT and MR
  • AI Framework hosts third-party algorithms beside its own
  • DICOM and HL7 results to reporting systems
Read the full TeraRecon review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Eyenuk

71of 100

Top-ranked

TeraRecon

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Eyenuk and TeraRecon
DimensionEyenukTeraReconDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers18.2 / 18.20 / 18.2+18.2
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Eyenuk

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

TeraRecon

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

TeraRecon

FDA decisions

Show 2 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEyenukTeraRecon
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a1997
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.