MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

HeartFlow vs Infervision

Eight openFDA records stand behind HeartFlow, from DEN130045 in 2014 to K250902, decided July 18, 2025, for its coronary CT angiogram analyses. Infervision's product list names InferRead CT Coronary, yet openFDA shows no 510(k) for it under the three Infervision applicant names. For a US hospital starting a cardiac CT service, Infervision loses on that record. Its cleared products include InferRead Lung CT.AI (K192880 in July 2020, K240554 in May 2025) for lung nodules, InferRead CT Stroke.AI (K211179, August 2021) for hemorrhage triage on head CT, InferOperate Suite surgical planning (K250237, K260973) and InferCare RECIST (K252261). Infervision's Lung CT page calls the software PACS and RIS friendly, on-premise or cloud, and names no PACS vendor. Infervision suits a radiology department running a lung nodule pathway or a stroke worklist, and HeartFlow suits the cardiac imaging service reading coronary CTA.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

HeartFlow logo

HeartFlow

by HeartFlow · founded 2007

Coronary CT angiogram analysis: CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct), plaque analysis and a CCTA reading aid.

Infervision logo

Infervision

by Infervision · founded 2016

AI for CT lung nodules, CT stroke, surgical planning and RECIST follow-up, with FDA clearances for these CT products.

When to pick each one

HeartFlow

  • Eight openFDA records through July 2025
  • FFRct and plaque analysis from coronary CTA
Read the full HeartFlow review

Infervision

  • Lung nodule detection on CT, K192880 and K240554
  • Head CT hemorrhage triage, K211179
Read the full Infervision review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

HeartFlow

66of 100

Top-ranked

Infervision

57of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for HeartFlow and Infervision
DimensionHeartFlowInfervisionDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

HeartFlow

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Per studyn/an/aNo public list price. The 10-K describes revenue as pay-per-use.

Infervision

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecHeartFlowInfervision
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20072016
HQUSn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.