HeartFlow vs ScreenPoint Transpara
Transpara serves breast screening and HeartFlow serves cardiac CT. HeartFlow's Roadmap Analysis targets consistent CCTA reads across readers, and its Plaque Analysis quantifies plaque. ScreenPoint says Transpara works with whatever mammography systems a site owns, on 2D and 3D mammograms, for single or double reading. The vendor says it was the tool in MASAI, a randomized trial. The Lancet report is independent academic work from Lund University covering more than 105,000 women, and the vendor cites sensitivity of 80.5% against 73.8% for double reading at 98.5% specificity. Transpara has eight 510(k)s on openFDA, the newest decided in August 2026. A screening program or multi-site breast group is the buyer, and the MASAI result comes from a double-reading setting in Swedish screening.
Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

HeartFlow
by HeartFlow · founded 2007
Coronary CT angiogram analysis: CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct), plaque analysis and a CCTA reading aid.

ScreenPoint Transpara
by ScreenPoint Medical
Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.
When to pick each one
HeartFlow
- Roadmap Analysis for consistent CCTA reads
- Plaque Analysis cleared through 510(k)
ScreenPoint Transpara
- Detection on 2D and 3D mammograms
- MASAI randomized trial, per the vendor
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
HeartFlow
66of 100
ScreenPoint Transpara
56of 100
| Dimension | HeartFlow | ScreenPoint Transpara | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 18 / 18 | 18 / 18 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 4.2 | 0 / 4.2 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 2.4 | 0 / 2.4 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 12.7 / 18.2 | 12.7 / 18.2 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 7.8 / 7.8 | 7.8 / 7.8 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 8.4 / 12 | 6 / 12 | +2.4 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 6 / 6 | 0 / 6 | +6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
HeartFlow
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Per study | n/a | n/a | No public list price. The 10-K describes revenue as pay-per-use. |
ScreenPoint Transpara
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Virtual demo and contact only. |
Evidence
HeartFlow
FDA decisions
K250902 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-07-18
HeartFlow Analysis
K213857 (opens in new tab)510(k)2022-10-14
HeartFlow Analysis
K203329 (opens in new tab)510(k)2021-01-08
HeartFlow Analysis
K190925 (opens in new tab)510(k)2019-08-15
K182035 (opens in new tab)510(k)2018-12-06
Show 3 more
K161772 (opens in new tab)510(k)2016-08-24
K152733 (opens in new tab)510(k)2016-01-13
DEN130045 (opens in new tab)De Novo2014-11-26
FFRct
Peer-reviewed
2 PubMed records name HeartFlow.
- Prognostic value of CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (opens in new tab)
- Diagnostic Performance of AI-enabled Plaque Quantification from Coronary CT Angiography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound. (opens in new tab)
ScreenPoint Transpara
FDA decisions
K260898 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-08-14
Transpara (2.1.0)
K241831 (opens in new tab)510(k)2024-11-25
Transpara (2.1.0)
K232096 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-12-11
Transpara Density 1.0.0
K221347 (opens in new tab)510(k)2022-08-03
Transpara 1.7.2
K210404 (opens in new tab)510(k)2021-06-02
Transpara 1.7.0
Show 3 more
K193229 (opens in new tab)510(k)2020-03-05
Transpara
K192287 (opens in new tab)510(k)2019-12-10
Transpara
K181704 (opens in new tab)510(k)2018-11-21
Transpara
Peer-reviewed
3 PubMed records name ScreenPoint Transpara.
- Interval cancer, sensitivity, and specificity comparing AI-supported mammography screening with standard double reading without AI in the MASAI study: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, population-based, screening-accuracy trial. (opens in new tab)
- Screening performance and characteristics of breast cancer detected in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. (opens in new tab)
- Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. (opens in new tab)
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | HeartFlow | ScreenPoint Transpara |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | 2007 | n/a |
| HQ | US | NL |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full radiology comparison
Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.
