MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

HeartFlow vs ScreenPoint Transpara

Transpara serves breast screening and HeartFlow serves cardiac CT. HeartFlow's Roadmap Analysis targets consistent CCTA reads across readers, and its Plaque Analysis quantifies plaque. ScreenPoint says Transpara works with whatever mammography systems a site owns, on 2D and 3D mammograms, for single or double reading. The vendor says it was the tool in MASAI, a randomized trial. The Lancet report is independent academic work from Lund University covering more than 105,000 women, and the vendor cites sensitivity of 80.5% against 73.8% for double reading at 98.5% specificity. Transpara has eight 510(k)s on openFDA, the newest decided in August 2026. A screening program or multi-site breast group is the buyer, and the MASAI result comes from a double-reading setting in Swedish screening.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

HeartFlow logo

HeartFlow

by HeartFlow · founded 2007

Coronary CT angiogram analysis: CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct), plaque analysis and a CCTA reading aid.

ScreenPoint Transpara logo

ScreenPoint Transpara

by ScreenPoint Medical

Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.

When to pick each one

HeartFlow

  • Roadmap Analysis for consistent CCTA reads
  • Plaque Analysis cleared through 510(k)
Read the full HeartFlow review

ScreenPoint Transpara

  • Detection on 2D and 3D mammograms
  • MASAI randomized trial, per the vendor
Read the full ScreenPoint Transpara review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

HeartFlow

66of 100

Top-ranked

ScreenPoint Transpara

56of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for HeartFlow and ScreenPoint Transpara
DimensionHeartFlowScreenPoint TransparaDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.87.8 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 126 / 12+2.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

HeartFlow

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Per studyn/an/aNo public list price. The 10-K describes revenue as pay-per-use.

ScreenPoint Transpara

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Virtual demo and contact only.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecHeartFlowScreenPoint Transpara
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2007n/a
HQUSNL

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.