MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Infervision vs Viz.ai

A 2025 meta-analysis in Translational Stroke Research pooled 12 studies and 15,595 patients on Viz.ai and found shorter door-to-groin times (SMD -0.47) and door-in-door-out times (SMD -0.49), with no significant difference in clinical outcomes. The vendor describes alerts through a mobile app and group messaging with transfer coordination. Its Trust Center lists SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, and its ContaCT De Novo (DEN170073, granted February 13, 2018) covers LVO triage on CTA.

For head CT bleeds, Viz ICH has a 2024 Cureus retrospective accuracy study, and Viz ICH+ is part of K232363 of February 5, 2024. Infervision's InferRead CT Stroke.AI holds the triage clearance K211179, which the vendor describes as hemorrhage triage.

Viz.ai is the stronger pick when the hospital also moves LVO patients between sites, since the workflow data and transfer tools sit on that job. Infervision suits a hospital that wants lung nodule reading kept on its own servers, with on-premise or cloud deployment and PACS and RIS friendly tools per the vendor.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Infervision logo

Infervision

by Infervision · founded 2016

AI for CT lung nodules, CT stroke, surgical planning and RECIST follow-up, with FDA clearances for these CT products.

Viz.ai logo

Viz.ai

by Viz.ai · founded 2016

Care coordination platform with FDA-cleared imaging AI for stroke, vascular and cardiac conditions.

When to pick each one

Infervision

  • Lung nodule CT cleared as K192880
  • On-premise or cloud, PACS and RIS friendly
Read the full Infervision review

Viz.ai

  • Stroke alerts on a mobile app with transfer coordination
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 on its Trust Center
  • ContaCT De Novo for LVO triage, DEN170073
Read the full Viz.ai review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Infervision

57of 100

Solid choice

Viz.ai

89of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Infervision and Viz.ai
DimensionInfervisionViz.aiDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.218.2 / 18.2-5.5
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-7.8
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 1212 / 12-3.6
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Infervision

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Viz.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Sold to health systems after a demo request.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecInfervisionViz.ai
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20162016
HQn/aUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.