MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Iterative Health vs TeraRecon

TeraRecon is advanced visualization plus a platform that hosts other vendors' algorithms. Its own algorithms segment CT and MR: Cardiac.Chambers.MR (November 2024), Aorta.CT (January 2025) and Cardiovascular.Calcification.CT (October 2025), the last for GE or Siemens CT only. A cardiac imaging service that wants several vendors' results in one viewer buys it. The AI Framework page shows Infervision and Optellum among its partner logos.

On ownership, TeraRecon's About timeline lists SymphonyAI in 2020 and a ConcertAI integration in 2021, and its newsroom now writes ConcertAI's TeraRecon. Iterative Health appears as Iterative Scopes, Inc. on FDA files through 2024 and headlines a $77 million Series C aimed at clinical research.

SKOUT analyzes colonoscopy video, a decision for an endoscopy suite. Its sponsor-run randomized trial at five centers found 0.83 adenomas per colonoscopy without the device and 1.05 with it. A CT or MR service evaluating a viewer has nothing in that trial to weigh.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Iterative Health logo

Iterative Health

by Iterative Health · founded 2017

Real-time AI polyp detection for colonoscopy with the FDA-cleared SKOUT system, for endoscopists and endoscopy centers.

TeraRecon logo

TeraRecon

by ConcertAI · founded 1997

Advanced CT and MR visualization with cardiac, aorta and neuro AI, plus a vendor-agnostic platform to run third-party AI.

When to pick each one

Iterative Health

  • Endoscopy centers adding colonoscopy CADe
  • 0.83 to 1.05 adenomas per colonoscopy in the trial
Read the full Iterative Health review

TeraRecon

  • Runs several vendors' AI in one platform
  • Cardiac MR, aorta and neuro algorithms
Read the full TeraRecon review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Iterative Health

42of 100

Competitive

TeraRecon

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Iterative Health and TeraRecon
DimensionIterative HealthTeraReconDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Iterative Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

TeraRecon

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Iterative Health

FDA decisions

Show 1 more

TeraRecon

FDA decisions

Show 2 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecIterative HealthTeraRecon
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20171997
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.