Lyssn vs Nextvisit
Lyssn is bought by organizations that want to measure how sessions are delivered, and Nextvisit by clinicians who want the note written. Lyssn's buyer is an agency, behavioral health provider or crisis line. It records or uploads sessions and scores each against more than 75 measures, by the vendor's count, including empathy, active listening and 11 CBT subscales, then reports fidelity to funders and offers AI-scored training modules. It sells through a contact form, and its optional AI notes fill the organization's own template.
Nextvisit's buyer is a psychiatrist, NP, PA or therapist. It drafts SOAP, DAP, BIRP and intake notes, has templates for Spravato, TMS and MAT, and suggests ICD and CPT codes. The vendor says 300+ practices use it.
An agency building a supervision program starts with Lyssn, and a psychiatrist who wants coded notes starts with Nextvisit.
Mental health · Reviewed November 2, 2026
When to pick each one
Lyssn
- Rates recorded sessions on 75+ measures, vendor says
- Fidelity reports for funders
- AI-scored training modules
Nextvisit
- SOAP, DAP, BIRP and intake note templates
- Spravato, TMS and MAT templates
- ICD and CPT code suggestions
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Lyssn
36of 100
Nextvisit
33of 100
| Dimension | Lyssn | Nextvisit | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 13 | 13 / 13 | -13 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 7 | 2.1 / 7 | -2.1 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 9.8 / 14 | 0 / 14 | +9.8 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 6 / 6 | 0 / 6 | +6 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 6 / 12 | 3 / 12 | +3 |
| Pricing transparency | 5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | +2.5 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 4.2 / 6 | -4.2 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Lyssn
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | n/a | n/a | Enterprise. |
Nextvisit
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | n/a | n/a | Billed monthly. Annual billing $84 per month ($1,008 per year, "Save 15%"). 250 AI credits (about 200 notes). Start free, no card. |
| Provider+ | n/a | n/a | Billed monthly. Annual billing $169 per month ($2,028 per year). 1,000 AI credits (about 500 notes). Adds AriaMD, custom templates, peer review, EHR push. |
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Talk to sales. SSO, supervision, dedicated CSM. |
| Nextvisit Go | n/a | n/a | For therapists, separate workspace. 100 notes. $42 per month billed annually. 14-day trial, no card. |
Evidence
Lyssn
Peer-reviewed
4 PubMed records name Lyssn.
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Identify Effective Components of Computer-Assisted Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. (opens in new tab)
- Improving the quality of counseling and clinical supervision in opioid treatment programs: how can technology help? (opens in new tab)
- Harnessing Innovative Technologies to Train Nurses in Suicide Safety Planning With Hospital Patients: Formative Acceptability Evaluation of an eLearning Continuing Education Training. (opens in new tab)
Nextvisit
No FDA decision, peer-reviewed study or community post in our record.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Lyssn | Nextvisit |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Osmind, SimplePractice, Kalix |
| Founded | n/a | 2021 |
| HQ | US | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full mental health comparison
Two distinct markets in one category: provider tools (therapy-scribes, supervision AI, session analytics) and patient tools (CBT chatbots, mood trackers, AI companions). We separated them.