MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Milvue vs ScreenPoint Transpara

Milvue reads conventional radiographs of the skeleton and chest, while ScreenPoint reads 2D and 3D mammograms. Different departments buy each.

Emergency radiology groups reading skeletal films are Milvue's customers. TechCare Trauma (K242171, decided January 17, 2025) detects fractures on radiographs, SmartChest (K232410, decided May 10, 2024) covers chest radiographs, and flagged exams move up the worklist. Partners on the RIS and PACS side include Dedalus and Evolucare, and the chest nodule and opacity findings are listed for Europe only.

Breast screening services are ScreenPoint's customers. The vendor says Transpara was the tool in the MASAI randomized trial and cites sensitivity of 80.5% against 73.8% at 98.5% specificity over 105,000 women from the Lancet paper by Lund University. The vendor also reports a 29% detection gain and a 44% workload cut, drawn from different analyses.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Milvue logo

Milvue

by Milvue

AI fracture and chest X-ray detection with FDA 510(k) clearance in the US, plus a report pre-fill tool the vendor calls not a device.

ScreenPoint Transpara logo

ScreenPoint Transpara

by ScreenPoint Medical

Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.

When to pick each one

Milvue

  • Fracture detection on radiographs, TechCare Trauma K242171
  • RIS and PACS partners include Dedalus and Evolucare
  • Chest nodule and opacity findings listed for Europe only
Read the full Milvue review

ScreenPoint Transpara

  • Breast cancer detection on 2D and 3D mammograms
  • Eight 510(k)s, latest K260898
  • Tool used in the MASAI randomized screening trial, per vendor
Read the full ScreenPoint Transpara review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Milvue

55of 100

Solid choice

ScreenPoint Transpara

56of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Milvue and ScreenPoint Transpara
DimensionMilvueScreenPoint TransparaDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers18.2 / 18.212.7 / 18.2+5.5
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review3.9 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-3.9
Funding & adoption signal3 / 126 / 12-3
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Milvue

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

ScreenPoint Transpara

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Virtual demo and contact only.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecMilvueScreenPoint Transpara
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQFRNL

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.