Nextvisit vs Videra Health
Videra's lead paper, in npj Digital Medicine, is a machine-learning model study by Videra employees. It reports 2,420 participants, one video answer used to predict PHQ-9, GAD-7 and PCL-5 scores, and an assessment 64.6% shorter (78.4 seconds against 221.7). The vendor says Assess predicts those scores from as little as one minute. Nextvisit's evidence is a vendor case study of one psychiatric practice.
The two have different buyers. A solo psychiatrist is Nextvisit's. The vendor describes live transcription, ePrescribing and telehealth, the Provider tiers carry prices on the page, and sign-up needs no card. A treatment facility is Videra's. It claims 1,000+ facilities, its FAQ names Kipu Health, and the home, Sidekick, Assess and FAQ pages show no price and lead to a demo booking. Nextvisit's Enterprise tier adds SSO, supervision and a dedicated customer success manager, again through sales.
Mental health · Reviewed November 2, 2026
Nextvisit
by Nextvisit AI Inc · founded 2021
AI clinical documentation for psychiatrists, prescribers and therapists, with notes and codes drafted during the visit.
Videra Health
by Videra Health, Inc. · founded 2019
AI platform for behavioral health providers: Assess patient screening and Sidekick Notes ambient documentation.
When to pick each one
Nextvisit
- Provider prices listed, sign-up needs no card
- Live transcription with a patient timeline
- Enterprise adds SSO and supervision
Videra Health
- Assess predicts PHQ-9, GAD-7 and PCL-5 scores
- Kipu named in its FAQ
- Claims 1,000+ facilities, vendor figure
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Nextvisit
33of 100
Videra Health
33of 100
| Dimension | Nextvisit | Videra Health | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 13 / 13 | 13 / 13 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 2.1 / 7 | 2.1 / 7 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 14 | 0 / 14 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 4.2 / 6 | 4.2 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Nextvisit
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | n/a | n/a | Billed monthly. Annual billing $84 per month ($1,008 per year, "Save 15%"). 250 AI credits (about 200 notes). Start free, no card. |
| Provider+ | n/a | n/a | Billed monthly. Annual billing $169 per month ($2,028 per year). 1,000 AI credits (about 500 notes). Adds AriaMD, custom templates, peer review, EHR push. |
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Talk to sales. SSO, supervision, dedicated CSM. |
| Nextvisit Go | n/a | n/a | For therapists, separate workspace. 100 notes. $42 per month billed annually. 14-day trial, no card. |
Videra Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Nextvisit | Videra Health |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Osmind, SimplePractice, Kalix | Kipu Health |
| Founded | 2021 | 2019 |
| HQ | n/a | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Open the full mental health comparison
Two distinct markets in one category: provider tools (therapy-scribes, supervision AI, session analytics) and patient tools (CBT chatbots, mood trackers, AI companions). We separated them.