MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

RapidAI vs Viz.ai

An AJNR comparison in acute ischemic stroke found that CT perfusion volumes from RapidAI and Viz.ai are not interchangeable, so the platform picked shapes the numbers a team acts on. RapidAI's clearances run from iSchemaView RAPID in 2013 through Rapid ICH, ASPECTS and LVO in 2020 to Rapid 6.0 in 2024, and the vendor claims 2,500+ hospitals. Neuro-interventional teams that want perfusion, ASPECTS and LVO in one workflow fit Rapid.

A single-center retrospective study promoted by RapidAI reported 98% of confirmed LVOs detected against 73% for Viz.ai across about 1,590 code strokes. Viz.ai's FDA record has 12 entries, including De Novo authorizations for ContaCT and Viz HCM, and its transfer coordination suits a stroke network moving patients between hub and spoke sites. Viz lists HCM, ACS and cardiac amyloidosis, and Rapid's listed modules include no cardiac one. A health system that wants cardiac alerts next to stroke has to choose Viz, and Rapid loses that buyer.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

RapidAI logo

RapidAI

by RapidAI · founded 2017

Imaging platform for stroke, aneurysm, aortic and pulmonary embolism care, with CT perfusion, LVO and ICH modules.

Viz.ai logo

Viz.ai

by Viz.ai · founded 2016

Care coordination platform with FDA-cleared imaging AI for stroke, vascular and cardiac conditions.

When to pick each one

RapidAI

  • CT perfusion, ASPECTS, LVO and ICH modules
  • Vendor claims 2,500+ hospitals in 100+ countries
  • Perfusion comparison against Viz.ai published in AJNR
Read the full RapidAI review

Viz.ai

  • HCM, ACS and cardiac amyloidosis alongside stroke
  • ContaCT and Viz HCM De Novo authorizations
  • Mobile alerts and transfer coordination for stroke networks
Read the full Viz.ai review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

RapidAI

65of 100

Top-ranked

Viz.ai

89of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for RapidAI and Viz.ai
DimensionRapidAIViz.aiDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.218.2 / 18.2-5.5
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review3.9 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-3.9
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 1212 / 12-3.6
Pricing transparency5 / 52.5 / 5+2.5
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

RapidAI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Plann/an/aEnterprise.

Viz.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Sold to health systems after a demo request.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecRapidAIViz.ai
Free tierYesNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20172016
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.