MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

ScreenPoint Transpara vs TeraRecon

openFDA lists eight Transpara 510(k)s from K181704 on November 21, 2018 to K260898 on August 14, 2026, and Transpara Density (K232096) covers breast density. A group reading 2D and 3D mammograms, the setting of the MASAI screening trial, is the buyer, and the vendor calls the product vendor agnostic across FFDM and DBT systems. EU-Startups reported in April 2026 that ScreenPoint raised EUR 13.6M, EUR 11.9M of it equity from Insight Partners, Siemens Healthineers and others plus EUR 1.7M in grants.

TeraRecon sits in another department, with algorithms that run on CT and MR. DETECT runs imaging biomarkers during review, with modules for coronary plaque on cardiac CT, liver density on CT, and vertebral compression fractures and bone mineral density on chest or abdominal CT. TeraRecon Cardiac.Chambers.MR (K241312, November 5, 2024) segments cardiac chambers on adult MR, and Cardiovascular.Calcification.CT (K250288, October 23, 2025) outputs a calcium scoring mask for GE or Siemens CT only. A hospital cardiac imaging service is the buyer.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

ScreenPoint Transpara logo

ScreenPoint Transpara

by ScreenPoint Medical

Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.

TeraRecon logo

TeraRecon

by ConcertAI · founded 1997

Advanced CT and MR visualization with cardiac, aorta and neuro AI, plus a vendor-agnostic platform to run third-party AI.

When to pick each one

ScreenPoint Transpara

  • Detection and density on mammograms
  • Latest 510(k) K260898, August 2026
  • Works across FFDM and DBT systems, vendor says
Read the full ScreenPoint Transpara review

TeraRecon

  • DETECT plaque, hepatic and spine modules
  • Cardiac chambers segmentation on MR, K241312
  • Calcium scoring mask for GE or Siemens CT
Read the full TeraRecon review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

ScreenPoint Transpara

56of 100

Solid choice

TeraRecon

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for ScreenPoint Transpara and TeraRecon
DimensionScreenPoint TransparaTeraReconDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.20 / 18.2+12.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal6 / 128.4 / 12-2.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

ScreenPoint Transpara

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Virtual demo and contact only.

TeraRecon

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

TeraRecon

FDA decisions

Show 2 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecScreenPoint TransparaTeraRecon
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a1997
HQNLUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.