MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

ScreenPoint Transpara vs Viz.ai

Transpara has eight FDA 510(k)s, the newest K260898 from August 2026, and ScreenPoint says it was the AI in the MASAI trial, which Lund University ran and the Lancet journals published. The vendor reports sensitivity of 80.5% against 73.8% for standard double reading, at 98.5% specificity over 105,000 women. A breast screening program reading 2D and 3D mammograms is who it serves. Viz.ai answers a different call, a large vessel occlusion alert pushed to the on-call team's mobile app, and a stroke network that transfers patients between hospitals is the customer. A screening program and a stroke network never end up on the same shortlist, so neither tool takes a buyer from the other. ContaCT, the LVO software, was authorized through a De Novo on February 13, 2018 as radiological computer-assisted triage and notification on CTA. A meta-analysis of 12 studies and 15,595 patients found shorter door-to-groin and door-in-door-out times and no significant difference in clinical outcomes. Viz.ai says it is embedded in 2,000 hospitals.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

ScreenPoint Transpara logo

ScreenPoint Transpara

by ScreenPoint Medical

Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.

Viz.ai logo

Viz.ai

by Viz.ai · founded 2016

Care coordination platform with FDA-cleared imaging AI for stroke, vascular and cardiac conditions.

When to pick each one

ScreenPoint Transpara

  • 2D and 3D mammography screening reads
  • Eight FDA 510(k)s, newest August 2026
  • MASAI trial in Lancet journals, per vendor
Read the full ScreenPoint Transpara review

Viz.ai

  • Large vessel occlusion alerts under 2018 De Novo
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 listed
  • Meta-analysis shows faster door-to-groin times
Read the full Viz.ai review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

ScreenPoint Transpara

56of 100

Solid choice

Viz.ai

89of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for ScreenPoint Transpara and Viz.ai
DimensionScreenPoint TransparaViz.aiDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.218.2 / 18.2-5.5
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.87.8 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal6 / 1212 / 12-6
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

ScreenPoint Transpara

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Virtual demo and contact only.

Viz.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Sold to health systems after a demo request.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecScreenPoint TransparaViz.ai
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2016
HQNLUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.