- Free + ~$3-6/mo paid plans.
- Not disclosed
- Not disclosed
- —
- —
Graph-based related-paper visualization.
Free tier available.
Graph viz of related papers around a seed paper.
What it costs
Free tier only; no paid plans publicly disclosed.
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | — | — | Free + ~$3-6/mo paid plans. |
Source: vendor pricing page. Verified May 23, 2026.
What the literature says
5 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed evaluate Connected Papers in clinical contexts. The most relevant are shown below, ranked by editorial relevance score combining title match, study design, recency, and journal tier.
- Evaluation of AI Tools Versus the PRISMA Method for Literature Search, Data Extraction, and Study Composition in Glaucoma Systematic Reviews: Content Analysis.
- Meliante LA, Coco G, Rabiolo A, et al.· JMIR AI· 2025Systematic Review
- Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly popular in the scientific field, as it allows for the analysis of extensive datasets, summarizes results, and assists in writing academic papers. This study investigates the role of AI in the process of conducting a systematic literature review (SLR), focusing on its contributions and limitations at three key stages of its development, study selection, data extraction, and study composition, using glaucoma-related SLRs as case studies and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-based SLRs as benchmarks.…
- Artificial intelligence (AI) for social innovation in health education: promoting health literacy through personalized ai-driven learning tools - a systematic review.
- Tbaishat DM, Elfadel MW· BMC Med Educ· 2025Systematic Review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming health education by enabling personalized, adaptive, and scalable approaches that may enhance aspects of health literacy. Despite rapid adoption, comprehensive synthesis of AI tools' impact on health literacy as social innovation is limited. Understanding these effects guides educators, developers, and policymakers in designing potentially effective, inclusive, and ethical AI interventions. This review examines generative AI models, chatbots, and adaptive learning systems in supporting health literacy globally. A systematic review was conducted fol…
- Avoiding 'second victims' in healthcare: what support do staff want for coping with patient safety incidents, what do they get and is it effective? A systematic review.
- Simms-Ellis R, Harrison R, Sattar R, et al.· BMJ Open· 2025Systematic Review
- Incontrovertible evidence surrounds the need to support healthcare professionals after patient safety incidents (PSIs). However, what characterises effective organisational support is less clearly understood and defined. This review aims to determine what support healthcare professionals want for coping with PSIs, what support interventions/approaches are currently available and which have evidence for effectiveness. Systematic research review with narrative synthesis. Medline, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science databases (from 2010 to mid-2021; updated December 2022), reference lists of eligi…
- Presenting summary reports to patients with chronic health conditions to support values-based discussions and decision-making: A literature review.
- Cole AC, Liu CC, Bissram J, et al.· Patient Educ Couns· 2025Systematic Review
- Patient-centered care is the process of aligning medical decisions with patients' preferences, needs, and values. Helping patients clarify their preferences and values may improve shared decision making (SDM). Understand how summary reports impact patient and clinician behaviors for values-based discussions and SDM related to healthcare decisions. Searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL, with a supplemental search in Connected Papers. Studies presenting summary reports based on self-reported data from patients with chronic conditions and assessing SDM or decisional conflict as it relates…
- Effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in alleviating treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review.
- Khosravi M· Eur J Transl Myol· 2025Systematic Review
- The complexity of schizophrenia, particularly in cases resistant to traditional pharmacological treatments, poses significant challenges for clinicians and researchers. This systematic review synthesizes existing evidence on the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Utilizing the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in March 2025 using the "Connected Papers" tool and other sources such as Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus, focusing on studies related to "deep brain stimulation," "treatment-r…
Other research tools
See the full research tools ranking
PubMed AI Search
by NCBI / NLM
Native AI-enhanced PubMed query layer (free).
Free.Consensus
by Consensus
AI search over 200M peer-reviewed papers with Consensus Meter.
Free + $8.99-11.99/mo Premium + Enterprise.Elicit
by Elicit (Ought)
Systematic-review-grade AI literature assistant with structured data extraction.
Free + $10-42/mo Plus/Pro + Team.
Semantic Scholar
by Allen Institute for AI
Free academic search engine with TLDR summaries, 200M+ papers.
Free + API.