- Free 5 searches + $16/mo Pro + Enterprise.
- Not disclosed
- Not disclosed
- —
- —
Multi-agent deep literature search with high-precision claim.
Free tier available.
98% precision claim on systematic searches. Multi-agent architecture.
What it costs
Free tier only; no paid plans publicly disclosed.
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | — | — | Free 5 searches + $16/mo Pro + Enterprise. |
Source: vendor pricing page. Verified May 23, 2026.
What the literature says
2 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed evaluate Undermind in clinical contexts. The most relevant are shown below, ranked by editorial relevance score combining title match, study design, recency, and journal tier.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of finerenone in diabetic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of Asian and non-Asian populations.
- Raza SA, Rehman AU, Aamir AH, et al.· BMC Nephrol· 2025Meta-Analysis
- Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a major global burden, especially in Asia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of finerenone in diabetic kidney disease, comparing outcomes between Asian and non-Asian populations through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and the Undermind AI platform from inception through March 2025. Studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and subgroup analyses that evaluated finerenone in DKD patients. Primary outcomes included a reductio…
- Searching smarter, not harder: leveraging AI to enhance literature searches for theory-driven reviews-A methodological case study.
- Hunter R, Booth A, Wood L· BMC Med Res Methodol· 2026
- Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into literature searching has the potential to enhance research synthesis by improving the identification of conceptually rich or otherwise difficult-to-locate evidence. Theoretical or conceptual literature reviews, including realist reviews, often involve resource-intensive searches because they aim to trace nuanced ideas, mechanisms, or conceptual relationships across multiple sources. This case study illustrates the use of AI-powered tools to support and streamline such literature searching, using a realist review as an example. We applied AI tools-…
What clinicians say about Undermind
Aggregated from 6 public clinician mentions. We quote with attribution under fair-use commentary.
Aggregated sentiment from 6 public mentions
- mixed
- 0%
- 0.00
- Reddit·6
“Im sorry everyone Everything i had is falling apart,my mother hates me,everyone underminds me or takes me seriously.im so burnt out and never want to do anything anymore unless I'm ready,i can't trust my family anymore because they believe what they want.i failed school because of them and I cant get any help my family,ive been over dosed on mind altering meds and raped when is…”
Summarized from 6 public clinician mentions. We quote with attribution under fair-use commentary and never republish full reviews. See our editorial methodology for source weights.
Other research tools
See the full research tools ranking
PubMed AI Search
by NCBI / NLM
Native AI-enhanced PubMed query layer (free).
Free.Consensus
by Consensus
AI search over 200M peer-reviewed papers with Consensus Meter.
Free + $8.99-11.99/mo Premium + Enterprise.Elicit
by Elicit (Ought)
Systematic-review-grade AI literature assistant with structured data extraction.
Free + $10-42/mo Plus/Pro + Team.
Semantic Scholar
by Allen Institute for AI
Free academic search engine with TLDR summaries, 200M+ papers.
Free + API.
