Activ Surgical ActivSight vs Osso VR

A chief weighing ActivSight against Osso VR is comparing a device in the operating room with practice before it. ActivSight shows blood flow and tissue perfusion without dye during robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery, with two 510(k) clearances (K203550, K231344), sold to surgeons and robotic-platform makers at an unpublished price, and it is an imaging device with no training content. The vendor says surgeons adjust their plan about 20% of the time. Osso VR runs procedural practice on off-the-shelf headsets for an orthopedic residency director or a nurse educator, sold by contract with headsets extra. Its research page lists three randomized trials among six papers, and none of those outcomes is a patient outcome, so a buyer who needs patient-level evidence finds none from Osso, and ActivSight's 50-plus publications are the vendor's claim and not itemized. A robotic surgeon who wants perfusion on screen during the operation is the one buyer here with a reason to call Activ Surgical.