MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Aidoc vs Infervision

Infervision's InferRead CT Lung detects pulmonary nodules on CT (K192880, 2020, a CADe record). The vendor page adds lobe density and volume analysis and follow-up registration with volume doubling time, and marks nodule growth, emphysema and coronary calcium quantification for investigational use only. InferRead CT Stroke.AI (K211179) is its triage record, for hemorrhage on head CT. The chest X-ray product, InferRead DR Chest, has no openFDA record under the three applicant names, and an independent Zambian TB screening study of it measured 90.3% sensitivity and 39.2% specificity at a 0.12 cut-off. The pages call it PACS and RIS friendly, on-premise or cloud. Infervision serves lung screening programs and TB programs abroad. Aidoc's buyer is an emergency radiology group that wants PE and body CT triage. Its modules include a PE tool and CARE body CT triage (K252970), and it states ISO 13485:2016, MDSAP and EU MDR 2017/745. Infervision trails for that group, since its triage record addresses head CT hemorrhage.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Aidoc logo

Aidoc

by Aidoc · founded 2016

Clinical AI platform (aiOS) with FDA-cleared triage, notification and quantification algorithms for radiology and neurovascular care.

Infervision logo

Infervision

by Infervision · founded 2016

AI for CT lung nodules, CT stroke, surgical planning and RECIST follow-up, with FDA clearances for these CT products.

When to pick each one

Aidoc

  • PE tool and CARE body CT triage
  • States ISO 13485, MDSAP and EU MDR certificates
Read the full Aidoc review

Infervision

  • Lung nodule CADe on CT (K192880)
  • On-premise or cloud, PACS and RIS friendly
  • TB screening study, 90.3% sensitivity, 39.2% specificity
Read the full Infervision review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Aidoc

71of 100

Top-ranked

Infervision

57of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Aidoc and Infervision
DimensionAidocInfervisionDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal12 / 128.4 / 12+3.6
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Aidoc

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Clinical AI Starter (AWS Marketplace)n/an/aPrivate offer only. No trial is stated.
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price on aidoc.com. Quoted per module.

Infervision

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Aidoc

FDA decisions

Show 30 more

Peer-reviewed

4 PubMed records name Aidoc.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecAidocInfervision
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20162016
HQILn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.