MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Airs Medical vs Nanox.AI

Nanox's AI page claims 7 FDA clearances and 2 CE marks, while openFDA lists 12 records under the Zebra, Nanoxai and Nano-X AI applicant names. The current products on the page are HealthCCSng for coronary calcium, HealthOST for vertebral height loss and bone density, and HealthFLD for liver density, all run on CT scans acquired for other reasons. A radiology department with large CT volume and an opportunistic screening program takes Nanox. An MRI center with a backlog is the audience for Airs, which cites 1,700+ to 2,000+ institutions and whose FDA record includes SwiftSight-BodyComposition alongside SwiftMR.

Corewell Health's case study on the Nanox page cites nearly 4,000 new coronary calcification patients in 2023 against 268 in the prior two years. A 2025 Diagnostics clinical validation of HealthOST, on outpatient chest and abdomen CT for incidental vertebral compression fractures, reported 92.0% sensitivity at the 20% height-loss threshold, and the abstract's specificity figure starts at 52.7%.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Airs Medical logo

Airs Medical

by AIRS Medical Inc.

FDA-cleared AI MRI reconstruction (SwiftMR) and quantification (SwiftSight) for imaging centers and radiologists.

Nanox.AI logo

Nanox.AI

by Nano-X Imaging

CT AI for opportunistic screening: coronary calcium, vertebral fractures and liver fat on routine CT scans, for radiology departments.

When to pick each one

Airs Medical

  • MRI software with SwiftSight quantification
  • Airs cites 1,700+ to 2,000+ institutions
Read the full Airs Medical review

Nanox.AI

  • CT screening for coronary calcium, bone and liver fat
  • Vendor says it connects to PACS, EMR and report systems
  • HealthOST vertebral fracture sensitivity 92.0% in validation
Read the full Nanox.AI review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Airs Medical

37of 100

Competitive

Nanox.AI

35of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Airs Medical and Nanox.AI
DimensionAirs MedicalNanox.AIDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers7.3 / 18.20 / 18.2+7.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Airs Medical

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Nanox.AI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Airs Medical

FDA decisions

Show 2 more

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Airs Medical.

Nanox.AI

FDA decisions

Show 7 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecAirs MedicalNanox.AI
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQKRn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.