Harrison.ai vs Nanox.AI
The vendor positions Nanox.AI as reading CT scans acquired for other reasons. Its AI page lists three solutions, HealthCCSng for coronary calcium, HealthOST for vertebral height loss and bone density, and HealthFLD for liver fat, and links a US reimbursement demo. A 2025 Diagnostics validation of HealthOST on outpatient chest and abdomen CT reported 92.0% sensitivity at the 20% height-loss threshold, with the abstract's specificity figure starting at 52.7%. A health system running opportunistic CT screening, such as coronary calcium from lung-screening scans, buys Nanox. Harrison.ai reads acute studies, with vendor figures of up to 130 findings on head CT in under 90 seconds and up to 124 on chest X-ray in under 20, and an emergency radiology service triaging head CT and chest X-ray buys it. A Scottish Health Technologies Group summary of an NHS Grampian evaluation of its chest X-ray product gave 78% sensitivity, 91% specificity, 99.99% NPV and 3% PPV. Nanox's AI page lists no head CT or chest X-ray product, so the two sell to different services.
Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Harrison.ai
by Harrison.ai
Imaging AI for chest X-ray, head CT and chest CT, with up to 130 findings on head CT (vendor figure).

Nanox.AI
by Nano-X Imaging
CT AI for opportunistic screening: coronary calcium, vertebral fractures and liver fat on routine CT scans, for radiology departments.
When to pick each one
Harrison.ai
- Head CT and chest X-ray reading for acute care
- NHS deployments on Sectra and Philips PACS, per RCR registry
Nanox.AI
- Coronary calcium, bone and liver fat on routine CT
- US reimbursement demo offered
- HealthOST validation, 92.0% sensitivity, specificity from 52.7%
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Harrison.ai
35of 100
Nanox.AI
35of 100
| Dimension | Harrison.ai | Nanox.AI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 18 / 18 | 18 / 18 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 4.2 | 0 / 4.2 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 2.4 | 0 / 2.4 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 18.2 | 0 / 18.2 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 7.8 | 0 / 7.8 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 8.4 / 12 | 8.4 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Harrison.ai
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Book a demo. |
Nanox.AI
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Harrison.ai
FDA decisions
K253818 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-03-03
Annalise Enterprise (applicant Harrison-AI Medical Pty, Ltd.)
K250831 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-04-23
Annalise Enterprise
K231767 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-09-22
CTB Triage Trauma
K231384 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-09-22
CTB Triage Trauma
K231094 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-08-15
CTB Triage-OH
Show 4 more
K223240 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-04-03
CTB Triage Trauma
K222268 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-03-28
CXR Triage Trauma
K222179 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-03-28
CXR Triage Trauma
K213941 (opens in new tab)510(k)2022-02-24
CXR Triage Pneumothorax
Nanox.AI
FDA decisions
K241440 (opens in new tab)510(k)2024-08-19
HealthCCSng
K233080 (opens in new tab)510(k)2024-02-08
HealthFLD
K213944 (opens in new tab)510(k)2022-04-22
HealthOST
K211803 (opens in new tab)510(k)2021-12-15
HealthPPT
K210085 (opens in new tab)510(k)2021-09-15
HealthCCSng
Show 7 more
K202487 (opens in new tab)510(k)2020-12-04
HealthJOINT
K200905 (opens in new tab)510(k)2020-07-16
HealthMammo
K192901 (opens in new tab)510(k)2020-05-12
HealthVCF
K192320 (opens in new tab)510(k)2019-11-26
HealthCXR
K190424 (opens in new tab)510(k)2019-06-13
HealthICH
K190362 (opens in new tab)510(k)2019-05-06
HealthPNX
K172983 (opens in new tab)510(k)2018-06-13
HealthCCS
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Harrison.ai | Nanox.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | AU | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full radiology comparison
Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.
