CareBeam vs Fourier Health
Fourier Health takes in faxes, PDFs, scans and HL7 feeds, classifies and files them, and says it embeds cited specialty summaries into Epic, Cerner and Athena, with depth not stated. It sells to health systems, academic centers, specialty networks and MSOs, and it raised a US$8.4M seed round in October 2025. Its figures, 26M+ pages processed and 83.9% fewer records reviewed per patient, come from the vendor. CareBeam starts at the visit. It generates SOAP notes, referral letters and after-visit summaries, audits charts for coding gaps and suggests ICD-10 and CPT codes for independent practices. CareBeam Inc, a New York company, publishes a click-through BAA. The overlap is small, since Fourier handles records that arrive from outside and CareBeam handles notes written at the visit, though a specialty network with heavy referral volume might run both. Outside referral faxes at a health system are Fourier's job, and a pain and spine clinic's visit notes are CareBeam's.
AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026

CareBeam
by CareBeam Inc
AI documentation, chart auditing and E/M coding for independent and multispecialty practices, from encounter to claim.

Fourier Health
by Fourier Health · founded 2023
AI medical record intake and cited specialty summaries for health systems, specialty networks and MSOs, delivered into the EHR.
When to pick each one
CareBeam
- Documents the encounter and audits the chart
- Published click-through BAA
- Aimed at independent and multispecialty practices
Fourier Health
- Sorts inbound faxes, PDFs and scans
- Epic, Cerner and Athena embedding claimed
- Aimed at health systems and MSOs
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
CareBeam
34of 100
Fourier Health
47of 100
| Dimension | CareBeam | Fourier Health | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 7.8 / 13 | 13 / 13 | -5.2 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 10.5 / 21 | 6.3 / 21 | +4.2 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 4.8 / 12 | 12 / 12 | -7.2 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 5.2 | 0 / 5.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 3 / 6 | -3 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
CareBeam
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Verified November 2, 2026 from trycarebeam.com (opens in new tab).
Fourier Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. The site is sales-led with Request a demo and no pricing page. |
Verified November 2, 2026 from fourierhealth.com (opens in new tab).
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | CareBeam | Fourier Health |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | athenahealth, ModMed, Healthie, eClinicalWorks, Veradigm, Greenway | Epic, Cerner, Athena |
| Founded | n/a | 2023 |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full ai medical scribes comparison
The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.
