MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging vs VUNO

VUNO's DeepBrain (K231398) quantifies brain structures and lesions from MR, and a 2022 PLoS One study reported 96.4% sensitivity and 89.9% specificity for moderate to severe white matter hyperintensity volume. Circle's K212261 is LVO triage on CTA, and StrokeSENS ASPECTS (K250221) adds scoring. For a stroke service that wants triage at the scanner, VUNO falls short, because its two openFDA records are DeepBrain and a chest X-ray triage tool for pleural effusion and pneumothorax in adults (K241439).

VUNO's other buyers are chest X-ray services, retinal screening programs, bone age readers and ward teams using its vital-signs cardiac arrest tool. Circle's other buyer is a cardiac CT or MR reading team.

VUNO's home page and Circle's regulatory page state no HIPAA or SOC 2 status. VUNO lists ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and 27701:2019 certificates valid to November 2028. Circle's regulatory page lists ISO 13485:2016 and MDSAP under quality, so VUNO is the one with an information-security certificate to put in front of a hospital security review.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging logo

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

by Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. · founded 2007

cvi42 cardiac MR and CT software with FDA-cleared AI coronary plaque analysis and StrokeSENS acute stroke tools.

VU

VUNO

by VUNO Inc. · founded 2014

FDA-cleared AI for chest X-ray triage and brain MR volumetry, plus Korean-approved bone age and retinal screening tools.

When to pick each one

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

  • LVO triage on CTA, FDA K212261
  • ISO 13485 and MDSAP certificates listed
Read the full Circle Cardiovascular Imaging review

VUNO

  • Brain MR quantification, FDA K231398
  • Chest X-ray triage, FDA K241439
  • ISO 27001:2022 and 27701:2019 certificates
Read the full VUNO review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

42of 100

Competitive

VUNO

73of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging and VUNO
DimensionCircle Cardiovascular ImagingVUNODifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.218.2 / 18.2-18.2
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-7.8
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

VUNO

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Circle Cardiovascular Imaging

FDA decisions

Show 7 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecCircle Cardiovascular ImagingVUNO
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20072014
HQCAKR

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.