MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Cleerly vs Qure.ai

Qure.ai holds ten FDA 510(k) records, every one for a chest X-ray, head CT or lung CT product. qXR-LN is cleared for lung nodule detection by radiologists, pulmonologists and ER physicians reading adult frontal chest radiographs, and qER triages head CT. For tuberculosis screening, no FDA record carries that name, and the use rests on a 2021 WHO endorsement and CE marking. An independent evaluation of twelve TB products put qXR v3 at 95.5% sensitivity with 48.7% specificity at one threshold, and the CREATE study reported a 54.2% positive predictive value and 93.5% negative predictive value for its nodule malignancy score.

Qure.ai's cleared products suit a hospital radiology department reading chest films and head CT, and its WHO-endorsed TB tool suits a screening program. Cleerly suits an imaging group reading coronary CTA, with UnitedHealthcare, Cigna and Humana on its coverage list and CPT 75577 in effect. A department with both chest films and coronary CTA would contract both, since the tools cover different exams.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Cleerly logo

Cleerly

by Cleerly

AI-driven CCTA plaque quantification + CAD staging.

Qure.ai logo

Qure.ai

by Qure.ai

AI for chest X-ray (qXR), head CT (qER) and lung nodule CT, with TB screening. The homepage cites sites across 107 countries.

When to pick each one

Cleerly

  • Coronary CTA plaque and ischemia likelihood analysis
  • Payer coverage list includes Cigna and Humana
  • ISCHEMIA product 510(k) decision September 2023
Read the full Cleerly review

Qure.ai

  • qXR-LN nodule detection on adult chest radiographs
  • qER head CT triage, 510(k) since June 2020
  • WHO-endorsed TB chest X-ray screening since 2021
Read the full Qure.ai review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Cleerly

52of 100

Solid choice

Qure.ai

50of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Cleerly and Qure.ai
DimensionCleerlyQure.aiDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review3.9 / 7.80 / 7.8+3.9
Funding & adoption signal6 / 128.4 / 12-2.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Cleerly

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. The homepage offers a demo request.

Qure.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Grant funding is not stated on Qure pages.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecCleerlyQure.ai
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSIN

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.