MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Connected Papers vs Consensus

Connected Papers Academic is EUR 4.23 per month billed as EUR 50.81 annually, and Consensus Pro is $12 per month billed annually ($144 a year). Each has a free tier, five graphs a month on one side and 10 Pro messages with up to 3 Deep reviews on the other.

A postdoc moving into a new subfield with one review article in hand enters its DOI, arXiv, PubMed or Semantic Scholar link and gets related papers laid out by similarity. The graph shows relatedness and says nothing about quality, and it answers no clinical question.

Consensus answers one, with a meter that reflects the top retrieved papers and a medical mode over about 50,000 clinical guidelines and 8M journal articles, per the vendor. A 2026 JMIR test of nine tools on retracted articles produced no fully correct response set from Consensus. For an investigator compiling references for a grant Consensus is the riskier buy, since the graph at least hands over papers to read.

Research tools · Reviewed November 1, 2026

Connected Papers logo

Connected Papers

by Connected Papers

Builds a visual graph of papers related to one origin paper, arranged by similarity.

Consensus logo

Consensus

by Consensus · founded 2021

AI search across 250M+ research papers (vendor figure) with a Consensus Meter and Deep Search.

When to pick each one

Connected Papers

  • Free plan with 5 graphs monthly
  • Academic plan EUR 4.23 monthly, billed annually
  • Prior Works and Derivative Works views
Read the full Connected Papers review

Consensus

  • Consensus Meter on yes or no questions
  • Free tier with 10 Pro messages monthly
  • Medical mode over guidelines and top journals
Read the full Consensus review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Connected Papers

52of 100

Solid choice

Consensus

44of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Connected Papers and Consensus
DimensionConnected PapersConsensusDifference
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 210 / 21+8.4
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review6 / 60 / 6+6
Funding & adoption signal6 / 1212 / 12-6
Pricing transparency6.5 / 6.56.5 / 6.50
Years in market0 / 64.2 / 6-4.2

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Connected Papers

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Freen/an/a5 graphs per month, all features included.
Academicn/aEUR 50.81Unlimited graphs, for academics, non-profits and personal use.
Businessn/aEUR 169.38Unlimited graphs.

Consensus

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Freen/an/a10 Pro messages per month and up to 3 Deep reviews.
Pron/a$144Unlimited Pro messages and 15 Deep reviews per month. The month-to-month price is not shown.
Deepn/a$540200 Deep reviews per month. The month-to-month price is not shown.

Evidence

Consensus

No FDA decision, peer-reviewed study or community post in our record.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecConnected PapersConsensus
Free tierYesYes
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2021
HQn/aUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full research tools comparison

Literature search, paper summarization, citation analysis, systematic-review extraction. Consensus and OpenEvidence have absorbed most clinician research traffic in 2026. We compared the full universe.