MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Digital Diagnostics vs Exo

Exo Iris is a pocket-sized ultrasound with cardiac, lung and fluid AI. Its buyers are bedside clinicians, with Fort Bend County EMS and Geisinger as the vendor's case studies. openFDA lists eight 510(k) records between August 2021 and February 2026, including Lung AI in April 2025. An August 2026 release offers a subscription-free option after a one-time activation, with the price handled through the Exo Store or its sales address.

LumineticsCore checks adults 22 or older with diabetes for more than mild diabetic retinopathy, and its indication names a single camera, the Topcon NW400. The vendor says an operator takes two images per eye and the result comes back within 30 seconds. Zufall Health and Cahaba Medical Care, both customers the vendor names, are among the sites that buy it. Its FAQ says Digital Diagnostics cannot provide pricing, sells only to healthcare providers, and points to CPT 92229 for reimbursement.

The input marks the difference: a Topcon retinal photograph for LumineticsCore, a probe held to the patient for Exo Iris.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Digital Diagnostics logo

Digital Diagnostics

by Digital Diagnostics Inc.

LumineticsCore: De Novo authorized autonomous AI that detects more than mild diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos.

Exo logo

Exo

by Exo Imaging, Inc.

Handheld ultrasound with FDA-cleared AI for cardiac, lung and fluid assessment, for point-of-care clinicians.

When to pick each one

Digital Diagnostics

  • Reads retinal photos for diabetic retinopathy
  • Indicated for the Topcon NW400 camera
  • Reimbursable under CPT 92229, per the vendor
Read the full Digital Diagnostics review

Exo

  • Pocket ultrasound with cardiac, lung and fluid AI
  • Subscription-free option after one-time activation
  • Eight 510(k) records since August 2021
Read the full Exo review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Digital Diagnostics

28of 100

Niche fit

Exo

28of 100

Niche fit
Score by dimension for Digital Diagnostics and Exo
DimensionDigital DiagnosticsExoDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Digital Diagnostics

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Exo

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price verified.

Evidence

Digital Diagnostics

FDA decisions

Exo

FDA decisions

Show 3 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecDigital DiagnosticsExo
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.