MedAI Verdict
Radiology

AI Radiology

Digital Diagnostics logo

Digital Diagnostics

by Digital Diagnostics Inc.  ·  US

Last verified

LumineticsCore: De Novo authorized autonomous AI that detects more than mild diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos.

At a glance

Pricing
No public price.
HIPAA
Not disclosed
SOC 2
Not disclosed
EHRs
—
Founded
—
HQ
US
On this page

Independent score  ·  By our public rubric

28/100Niche fit

Not rated: too little independent evidence yet.

How it’s computed →
  • Regulatory & Compliance
    18/28

    FDA authorized (2 510(k) clearances, 1 De Novo grant on record)

  • Clinical Integration
    0/6.6

    No EHR integrations listed

  • Evidence Strength
    0/26

    No peer-reviewed coverage

  • Vendor & Market
    3/18

    Seed-stage or unfunded

  • Sentiment & Transparency
    2.5/5

    Pricing on request, no public amounts

▸ Show all 11 dimensions

Regulatory & Compliance

  • FDA clearance18/18

    FDA authorized (2 510(k) clearances, 1 De Novo grant on record)

  • HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0/10

    No public HIPAA/SOC2/BAA attestation

Clinical Integration

  • EHR integrations (count)0/4

    No EHR integrations listed

  • Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0/2

    None of the top-3 EHRs covered

Evidence Strength

  • Peer-reviewed papers0/18

    No peer-reviewed coverage

  • RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0/8

    No RCT, meta-analysis, or systematic review

Vendor & Market

  • Funding & adoption signal3/12

    Seed-stage or unfunded

  • Years in market0/6

    Founded year not recorded

Sentiment & Transparency

  • Pricing transparency3/5

    Pricing on request, no public amounts

Scored November 2, 2026 · Public scoring method v1.2.0

LumineticsCore: De Novo authorized autonomous AI that detects more than mild diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos.

No public price.

Bottom line

LumineticsCore, formerly IDx-DR, screens retinal photographs for diabetic retinopathy and, in the vendor's description, makes the diagnosis without a physician reading the images. It is De Novo authorized as DEN180001, granted April 11, 2018, and two FDA-cleared 510(k) updates followed. The vendor's indication limits it to adults 22 or older with diabetes and no prior diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy, imaged with a Topcon NW400. It fits a primary care clinic screening that population. The vendor's indication names the Topcon NW400, and other cameras are not stated on its pages. The vendor sells only to healthcare providers and quotes no price.

What does the vendor say LumineticsCore does?

In the vendor's description, an operator takes two images per eye and submits them, and the result returns within 30 seconds. The vendor states the indication as detecting more than mild diabetic retinopathy, abbreviated mtmDR, and says it was the first company to receive FDA clearance for an AI diagnostic platform that makes a diagnosis without physician input. Its outcome claims include 91% of unnecessary specialty visits avoided in its trial for FDA authorization, eye exam adherence rising from 12% to 30% at Zufall Health, and diabetic retinopathy diagnosed in more than one in four patients tested at Cahaba Medical Care within 90 days. Other customers it names are Tarzana Treatment Centers, Johns Creek Primary Care, OSF HealthCare, Urban Health Plan and AbsoluteCare.

What does the De Novo decision cover?

DEN180001 is IDx-DR, requested by IDx, LLC of Iowa City under product code PIB, "diabetic retinopathy detection device," 21 CFR 886.1100. FDA received it on January 12, 2018 and granted it as a Class II device on April 11, 2018. The FDA-cleared follow-ups are K203629 (June 10, 2021) and K213037 (IDx-DR v2.3, June 17, 2022), both under PIB. FDA's records still use the IDx-DR name and none carries the name LumineticsCore.

The vendor lists CPT 92229 as the reimbursement code. By its account the code was created in 2019, CMS proposed a rule on it in August 2020, and in early 2023 CMS changed the wording from "automated" to "autonomous diagnosis."

What do the published studies report?

A systematic review and meta-analysis of IDx-DR accuracy reports a pooled AUC of 0.95 (PMID 39986640). A comparison of Mona DR and IDx-DR against human grading reports a kappa of 0.43, described as moderate, for IDx-DR and 0.68 for Mona DR. A real-world comparison with ophthalmologist fundoscopy grading reports an exact match of 54.2% and undergrading of 4.8%. The vendor's product page gives no sensitivity or specificity.

The verdict

LumineticsCore suits a primary care clinic that screens adults with diabetes on the Topcon NW400 and wants an autonomous result under CPT 92229, the code the vendor lists as reimbursable. The vendor sells only to healthcare providers.

Editorial review last generated November 2, 2026. Synthesized from clinician sentiment, peer-reviewed coverage, and our editorial silo picks. Refined by hand where vendor facts change.

What it costs

All tiers are custom-quoted. The vendor does not publish per-provider list pricing.

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
EnterpriseNot statedNot statedNo public price.

Source: vendor pricing page. Last checked November 2, 2026.

What deploys cleanly

Carries FDA 510(k), ISO 13485:2016 (vendor-stated, site footer) per vendor documentation. Independent attestation review is the buyer's responsibility before clinical deployment.

Who builds it

It was previously known as IDx-DR, an acquisition or rebrand that healthcare-AI buyers should track when reviewing prior independent coverage.