MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Eyenuk vs Lunit

Lunit sells chest X-ray and breast imaging AI and Eyenuk sells retinal screening, so a radiology department or breast center buys Lunit and a diabetes clinic that photographs retinas buys Eyenuk. INSIGHT CXR holds a Triage clearance (K211733, November 10, 2021), INSIGHT MMG's latest is K260320 (v1.1.10, April 23, 2026), and INSIGHT DBT's latest is K253796 (V1.2, March 26, 2026). Radiology Business put the Volpara acquisition, completed in May 2024, at about US$193 million. Lunit's own timeline says the WHO recommended it as a TB screening tool. A 2023 Diagnostics prospective multicenter study of 4,752 cases found an AUC of 0.84 for a Lunit product against 0.94 retrospectively, and an independent 2025 PLOS Digital Health comparison found a newer INSIGHT CXR version less accurate for TB reading until its threshold was recalibrated.

Eyenuk's evidence includes a 2021 British Journal of Ophthalmology prospective evaluation of EyeArt in English screening of 30,000 patients and a 2021 JAMA Network Open multicenter prospective evaluation of autonomous detection of referable and vision-threatening DR. The vendor says over 90% of patients get conclusive results without dilation.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Eyenuk logo

Eyenuk

by Eyenuk, Inc.

EyeArt is FDA-cleared autonomous AI that grades diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos, with no physician overread needed.

Lunit logo

Lunit

by Lunit · founded 2013

AI for chest X-ray, mammography and breast tomosynthesis, Volpara breast-density tools, and pathology biomarker software (SCOPE).

When to pick each one

Eyenuk

  • 2021 English screening evaluation of 30,000 patients
  • Vendor says over 90% conclusive without dilation
Read the full Eyenuk review

Lunit

  • Chest X-ray, mammography and tomosynthesis reading aids
  • INSIGHT DBT latest K253796, March 26, 2026
  • MDR CE and UKCA marks, announced November 2022
Read the full Lunit review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Eyenuk

71of 100

Top-ranked

Lunit

66of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Eyenuk and Lunit
DimensionEyenukLunitDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers18.2 / 18.212.7 / 18.2+5.5
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.87.8 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Eyenuk

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Lunit

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Contact form only.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEyenukLunit
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2013
HQUSKR

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.