MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Eyenuk vs Pearl

Pearl's FAQ names DEXIS, Carestream, Romexis, Sidexis, Open Dental and Eaglesoft among its integrations, so dental groups on those systems are its audience. Second Opinion reads bitewing, periapical and panoramic radiographs. K250525 (Second Opinion Panoramic, November 14, 2025) covers caries, periapical radiolucency and impacted third molars on panoramic films, and the earliest, K210365, is dated March 4, 2022. Pearl's home page cites more than 29,000 practices and 26-plus clearances, while its About page says 23,000-plus practices and 26 clearances. A 2026 Caries Research comparison on bitewings, covering five commercial systems that included Second Opinion, put secondary-caries sensitivity between 0.327 and 0.487.

A dental group buys Pearl for tooth findings, and a diabetic eye-screening site buys EyeArt for retinal grading. Eyenuk's FAQ cites CPT 92229, which it says has an established national Medicare price, and the vendor reports 96% sensitivity and 88% specificity for more than mild DR.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Eyenuk logo

Eyenuk

by Eyenuk, Inc.

EyeArt is FDA-cleared autonomous AI that grades diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos, with no physician overread needed.

Pearl logo

Pearl

by Pearl Inc. · founded 2019

FDA-cleared dental x-ray AI (Second Opinion) that marks caries, bone loss and restorations, for dentists and DSOs.

When to pick each one

Eyenuk

  • Vendor reports 96% sensitivity, 88% specificity for more than mild DR
  • FAQ cites CPT 92229 with a Medicare national price
Read the full Eyenuk review

Pearl

  • FAQ names DEXIS, Open Dental and Eaglesoft integrations
  • Panoramic reads cleared as K250525, November 14, 2025
  • Smile Brands rollout announced June 2026
Read the full Pearl review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Eyenuk

71of 100

Top-ranked

Pearl

33of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Eyenuk and Pearl
DimensionEyenukPearlDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers18.2 / 18.20 / 18.2+18.2
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 64.2 / 6-4.2

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Eyenuk

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Pearl

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEyenukPearl
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2019
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.