MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Eyenuk vs Qure.ai

Eyenuk's 2023 release reports 94.4% sensitivity and 91.1% specificity for more than mild diabetic retinopathy in the prospective trial NCT04984200. The intended population is adults with diabetes not previously diagnosed with DR. EyeArt reads retinal photographs for diabetes screening and qXR reads chest X-rays for TB screening, so a diabetes service and a national TB program work from different images.

Qure.ai markets TB screening, and the vendor says the WHO endorsed its chest X-ray solution in 2021 for use without a human reader. An evaluation titled "Independent evaluation of 12 artificial intelligence solutions for the detection of tuberculosis" reported qXR v3 at 95.5% sensitivity and 48.7% specificity at a single threshold. Qure.ai's ten openFDA records cover head CT, chest X-ray and lung nodule CT products, including qCT Lung v1.0 (K261517, decided September 14, 2026), and none is named for TB screening. Qure.ai raised a $65 million Series D in September 2024, led by Lightspeed and 360 ONE.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Eyenuk logo

Eyenuk

by Eyenuk, Inc.

EyeArt is FDA-cleared autonomous AI that grades diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos, with no physician overread needed.

Qure.ai logo

Qure.ai

by Qure.ai

AI for chest X-ray (qXR), head CT (qER) and lung nodule CT, with TB screening. The homepage cites sites across 107 countries.

When to pick each one

Eyenuk

  • Trial NCT04984200, per Eyenuk's 2023 release, 94.4% sensitivity
  • Adults with diabetes not previously diagnosed with DR
Read the full Eyenuk review

Qure.ai

  • Vendor says WHO endorsed its TB chest X-ray tool in 2021
  • Chest X-ray, head CT and lung nodule CT products
  • qCT Lung v1.0 K261517, September 14, 2026
Read the full Qure.ai review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Eyenuk

71of 100

Top-ranked

Qure.ai

50of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Eyenuk and Qure.ai
DimensionEyenukQure.aiDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers18.2 / 18.212.7 / 18.2+5.5
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Eyenuk

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Qure.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Grant funding is not stated on Qure pages.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEyenukQure.ai
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSIN

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.