MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Gleamer vs TeraRecon

TeraRecon's AI Framework page lists Gleamer among 16 partner logos, with no detail on how the arrangement works. The framework hosts algorithms from several vendors on one study, with physician review before results are committed.

Radiology departments that want advanced CT and MR viewing, cardiac MR workflows and a place to run outside AI are TeraRecon's customers. The vendor claims more than 2,000 of them. Its own cleared algorithms include Cardiovascular.Calcification.CT (K250288, October 23, 2025) and TR Neuro perfusion for CT and MR.

A chest-imaging service that wants pneumothorax and nodule flags on chest films fits ChestView US, cleared as K241620 on February 27, 2025 and again as K252486 on September 9, 2026. Gleamer announced a Siemens Healthineers Digital Marketplace partnership on September 6, 2024. For fracture or chest film reading Gleamer is the tool of the pair, since TeraRecon's algorithmic openFDA decisions cover MR mapping, structural heart, perfusion, cardiac chambers, aorta and calcium scoring software.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Gleamer logo

Gleamer

by Gleamer SAS

Radiology AI for fracture and chest X-ray findings, plus CT, MRI and mammography; part of RadNet DeepHealth since March 2026.

TeraRecon logo

TeraRecon

by ConcertAI · founded 1997

Advanced CT and MR visualization with cardiac, aorta and neuro AI, plus a vendor-agnostic platform to run third-party AI.

When to pick each one

Gleamer

  • ChestView US cleared as K241620 and K252486
  • Siemens Healthineers Digital Marketplace partnership
Read the full Gleamer review

TeraRecon

  • Cardiac MR workflows beside a host for outside AI
  • Vendor claims more than 2,000 customers
  • Own algorithms for aorta and coronary calcium
Read the full TeraRecon review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Gleamer

56of 100

Solid choice

TeraRecon

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Gleamer and TeraRecon
DimensionGleamerTeraReconDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers18.2 / 18.20 / 18.2+18.2
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Gleamer

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

TeraRecon

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

TeraRecon

FDA decisions

Show 2 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecGleamerTeraRecon
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a1997
HQFRUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.