MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Infervision vs Lunit

Lunit's chest X-ray product, INSIGHT CXR Triage, is K211733 of November 10, 2021, code QFM. Infervision's six openFDA records are lung nodule CT (K192880 of July 2, 2020 and K240554 of May 16, 2025), head CT triage, surgical planning and RECIST software, and none is named for InferRead DR Chest. A US hospital buying chest X-ray AI starts from a cleared triage product with Lunit and from none with Infervision.

Each vendor points its chest X-ray tool at TB screening. Lunit's timeline says the WHO recommended it for that use, and a 2025 independent comparison in PLOS Digital Health found a newer INSIGHT CXR version less accurate until its threshold was recalibrated.

A lung nodule program reading CT is Infervision's customer, with follow-up registration and volume doubling time in InferRead Lung CT.AI. A breast screening service is Lunit's, using INSIGHT MMG, DBT and the Volpara density tools, bought in 2024 for about US$193M by Radiology Business's figure.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Infervision logo

Infervision

by Infervision · founded 2016

AI for CT lung nodules, CT stroke, surgical planning and RECIST follow-up, with FDA clearances for these CT products.

Lunit logo

Lunit

by Lunit · founded 2013

AI for chest X-ray, mammography and breast tomosynthesis, Volpara breast-density tools, and pathology biomarker software (SCOPE).

When to pick each one

Infervision

  • Lung nodule CADe on CT, K192880 and K240554
  • Follow-up registration with volume doubling time
Read the full Infervision review

Lunit

  • Chest X-ray triage cleared as K211733
  • Mammography and tomosynthesis AI with Volpara density tools
Read the full Lunit review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Infervision

57of 100

Solid choice

Lunit

66of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Infervision and Lunit
DimensionInfervisionLunitDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-7.8
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Infervision

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Lunit

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Contact form only.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecInfervisionLunit
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20162013
HQn/aKR

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.