MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Infervision vs Qure.ai

Infervision suits a radiology group reading chest CT that wants nodule follow-up with volume doubling time, and a thoracic service that wants 3D surgical planning from InferOperate. InferRead Lung CT.AI was cleared in July 2020 and again in May 2025. Qure.ai suits a hospital that wants head CT triage and lung nodule CT next to chest X-ray, with qER first cleared in June 2020 and qCT Lung in September 2026.

TB screening is where the two reach the same setting. An independent Lusaka evaluation of InferRead DR Chest reported 90.3% sensitivity at 39.2% specificity at cut-off 0.12. A separate 12-product evaluation reported qXR v3 at 95.5% sensitivity and 48.7% specificity at one threshold. Those are two studies with different designs.

On chest X-ray the records differ in what they name. Qure.ai's include qXR-LN (K231805, December 2023) for nodules on adult frontal chest radiographs and qXR-PTX-PE (K230899, August 2023) for pneumothorax and effusion triage. Infervision's six name InferRead Lung CT.AI, InferRead CT Stroke.AI, InferOperate Suite and InferCare RECIST. For a community hospital radiology department buying chest X-ray AI, Infervision loses.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Infervision logo

Infervision

by Infervision · founded 2016

AI for CT lung nodules, CT stroke, surgical planning and RECIST follow-up, with FDA clearances for these CT products.

Qure.ai logo

Qure.ai

by Qure.ai

AI for chest X-ray (qXR), head CT (qER) and lung nodule CT, with TB screening. The homepage cites sites across 107 countries.

When to pick each one

Infervision

  • Lung CT nodule follow-up with volume doubling time
  • 3D surgical planning and RECIST follow-up cleared
Read the full Infervision review

Qure.ai

  • Chest X-ray nodule detection, K231805 December 2023
  • Ten FDA 510(k) clearances across chest, head CT and lung CT
Read the full Qure.ai review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Infervision

57of 100

Solid choice

Qure.ai

50of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Infervision and Qure.ai
DimensionInfervisionQure.aiDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Infervision

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Qure.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Grant funding is not stated on Qure pages.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecInfervisionQure.ai
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2016n/a
HQn/aIN

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.