MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Iterative Health vs Overjet

SKOUT reads colonoscopy video and Overjet reads dental radiographs, so one buyer is a GI group and the other is a dental practice or DSO. SKOUT marks polyps live during the procedure. Overjet's Vision AI covers bitewing and periapical radiographs.

SKOUT's evidence is a sponsor-run randomized trial with 22 endoscopists at five centers. Adenomas per colonoscopy were 1.05 with the device against 0.83 without (P=.002), and adenoma detection rate was 47.8% against 43.9% (P=.065, not significant). A GI center that tracks adenoma detection rate as its quality measure sees a gain that did not clear significance in that trial.

Overjet suits a dental group whose compliance team asks for HITRUST, since its trust center states an independent HITRUST audit was completed. openFDA holds twelve Overjet records, from caries and calculus tools to CBCT Assist and the Iris imaging system. In a 2026 Journal of Dentistry comparison against micro-CT at the dentin threshold, Caries Assist reached 56% sensitivity, with bitewing reading at 75% and ICDAS scoring at 100%.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Iterative Health logo

Iterative Health

by Iterative Health · founded 2017

Real-time AI polyp detection for colonoscopy with the FDA-cleared SKOUT system, for endoscopists and endoscopy centers.

Overjet logo

Overjet

by Overjet · founded 2018

FDA-cleared dental x-ray AI for caries, calculus, periapical lesions and tooth charting, for dentists and dental groups.

When to pick each one

Iterative Health

  • Real-time polyp detection on colonoscopy video
  • Randomized trial: 1.05 vs 0.83 adenomas per colonoscopy
Read the full Iterative Health review

Overjet

  • Dental bitewing, periapical and CBCT analysis
  • Trust center states a completed HITRUST audit
Read the full Overjet review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Iterative Health

42of 100

Competitive

Overjet

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Iterative Health and Overjet
DimensionIterative HealthOverjetDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Iterative Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Overjet

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Iterative Health

FDA decisions

Show 1 more

Overjet

FDA decisions

Show 6 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecIterative HealthOverjet
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20172018
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.