MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Lunit vs ScreenPoint Transpara

Lunit's mammography records run through April 2026 and Transpara's through August 2026, with eight Transpara 510(k) records against five Lunit records for breast imaging. Transpara supports cancer detection on 2D and 3D mammograms and added a density tool (K232096). The vendor says the MASAI randomized trial in Swedish screening used it, and cites 12% fewer interval cancers and sensitivity of 80.5% against 73.8% at 98.5% specificity, from a Lancet paper by Lund University. Lunit offers breast and chest products from one vendor, with its chest X-ray record limited to triage (K211733) and Volpara tools for density and positioning. Its 2026 European Radiology paper follows long-term prognosis of AI-detected versus undetected cancers on INSIGHT MMG v1.1.8.2. A screening service that wants a randomized trial behind its reading support has one for Transpara, per the vendor, and a prognosis study for Lunit. A center that wants chest X-ray triage (K211733) alongside breast work goes to Lunit.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Lunit logo

Lunit

by Lunit · founded 2013

AI for chest X-ray, mammography and breast tomosynthesis, Volpara breast-density tools, and pathology biomarker software (SCOPE).

ScreenPoint Transpara logo

ScreenPoint Transpara

by ScreenPoint Medical

Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.

When to pick each one

Lunit

  • Mammography, tomosynthesis and chest X-ray from one vendor
  • Long-term prognosis study on INSIGHT MMG, 2026
Read the full Lunit review

ScreenPoint Transpara

  • Density tool cleared under K232096
  • MASAI randomized trial used Transpara, per the vendor
Read the full ScreenPoint Transpara review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Lunit

66of 100

Top-ranked

ScreenPoint Transpara

56of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Lunit and ScreenPoint Transpara
DimensionLunitScreenPoint TransparaDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.87.8 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 126 / 12+2.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Lunit

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Contact form only.

ScreenPoint Transpara

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Virtual demo and contact only.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecLunitScreenPoint Transpara
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2013n/a
HQKRNL

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.